HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508.jpg

1.54 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic paper / scientific article (evidence document)
File Size: 1.54 MB
Summary

This document is page 296 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., likely related to game theory and evolutionary biology. It describes 'The Envelope Game,' a theoretical model involving two players, temptations to defect, and the concept of 'cooperate without looking' (CWOL) as a Nash equilibrium. The text discusses the mathematical conditions for this equilibrium and connects the game to the concept of 'Authentic Altruism.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research (Epstein was known to fund evolutionary biologists including Martin Nowak, a frequent collaborator of Hoffman).

People (3)

Name Role Context
M. Hoffman Author
Listed in the header as 'M. Hoffman et al.'
Batson Cited Author
Cited in text regarding altruism (2014)
Andreoni Cited Author
Cited in text regarding anticipation of feeling good

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508'

Relationships (1)

M. Hoffman Professional/Co-author Unknown Co-authors
Header lists 'M. Hoffman et al.'

Key Quotes (3)

"In this model, as long as temptations are rare, large, and harmful to player 2, it is a Nash equilibrium for player 1 to “cooperate without looking” in the envelope"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508.jpg
Quote #1
"We refer to this as the cooperate without looking (CWOL) equilibrium."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508.jpg
Quote #2
"Authentic Altruism. Many have asked whether “[doing good is] always and exclusively motivated by the prospect of some benefit for ourselves, however subtle”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document