M. Hoffman
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dalkiran, N. A.
|
Co author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paturi, R.
|
Co author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thaler
|
Academic citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Locke
|
Academic citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unspecified Co-authors
|
Academic collaboration |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
et al (Other authors)
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
M. A. Nowak
|
Co author |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Man in Palm Beach / Epstein (Implied)
|
Academic patronage implied context |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Haidt
|
Academic citation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Co-authors
|
Professional co author |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Academic discussion on Game Theory, Altruism, and Ethics. | Academic Publication | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015528.jpg
This document is page 316 of a bibliography from an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al. It lists references regarding evolutionary biology, economics, and psychology, including works by Robert Trivers, E.O. Wilson, and Martin Nowak (a known Epstein associate). The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015526.jpg
This document is page 314 of a bibliography or reference list from an academic paper authored by 'M. Hoffman et al.' (likely Moshe Hoffman). It lists various scientific publications covering topics such as game theory, evolutionary psychology, moral cognition, and economics, with citations ranging from 1958 to 2014. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015526', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to the inquiry into MIT Media Lab's funding relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015524.jpg
This document is page 312 of an academic text (likely a book chapter by M. Hoffman et al.) stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. The text discusses evolutionary game theory, arguing against 'Group Selection' as the primary driver of morality and suggesting that logical justifications for morality (like those of Kant or Locke) are merely post-hoc rationalizations for evolutionary instincts. It includes a controversial utilitarian example suggesting that the 'norm against murder' causes 'waste' by keeping alive individuals with no future productivity.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015522.jpg
This document is a page from an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015522). It discusses behavioral psychology concepts including 'Norms' (conditional cooperation), 'Strategic Ignorance' (avoiding information to evade moral obligation, using STDs and financial choices as examples), and the 'Norm of Reciprocity'. While the text itself does not explicitly name Epstein, the subject matter (strategic ignorance) and author (likely Moshe Hoffman of MIT Media Lab) suggest it is part of the investigation into institutional knowledge and acceptance of Epstein's donations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015520.jpg
This document is page 308 of an academic paper (authored by M. Hoffman et al.) discussing the psychology of charitable giving, focusing on 'Magnitude of the Problem' and 'Observability.' It argues that donors are often motivated by social rewards and reputational concerns rather than the actual efficacy of their donations, citing the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge and various behavioral studies. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, suggesting it was included in a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to academia (e.g., MIT/Harvard).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015518.jpg
This document is page 306 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., discussing game theory, specifically the 'Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma' and the evolution of altruism and cooperation. The text explores mathematical models of cooperation, reciprocity, and Nash equilibrium. While the content is purely academic, the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to inquiries into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of academic research (such as Martin Nowak's PED at Harvard, though Nowak is not explicitly named on this page).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015514.jpg
This document is page 302 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., discussing moral psychology, game theory (Nash equilibrium), and the distinction between harm as a 'means' versus a 'by-product.' It cites various studies (Cushman, Greene, DeScioli) and uses examples involving Israel/Hamas, the US drone policy, and Bashar al-Assad's use of chemical weapons to illustrate theories on coordinated punishment and moral intuitions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included in a document production to the US House Oversight Committee, though the text itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015510.jpg
This document is a page from an academic paper (Page 298) discussing moral psychology, specifically 'Attention to Motives' and 'Altruism Without Prospect of Reciprocation.' It cites various studies, including a 2014 paper by 'Rand & Epstein,' which is likely the reason for its inclusion in the House Oversight investigation files (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015510). The text uses the heroic death of Professor Liviu Librescu at Virginia Tech as an example of altruistic behavior.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508.jpg
This document is page 296 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., likely related to game theory and evolutionary biology. It describes 'The Envelope Game,' a theoretical model involving two players, temptations to defect, and the concept of 'cooperate without looking' (CWOL) as a Nash equilibrium. The text discusses the mathematical conditions for this equilibrium and connects the game to the concept of 'Authentic Altruism.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015508' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research (Epstein was known to fund evolutionary biologists including Martin Nowak, a frequent collaborator of Hoffman).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015506.jpg
This document appears to be page 294 of an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al., included as evidence in a House Oversight investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015506). The text discusses behavioral economics and game theory, specifically the 'Hawk-Dove model' as it relates to property rights, the endowment effect, the IKEA effect, and the sunk cost fallacy. It cites various researchers including Kahneman, Thaler, and Locke, but does not contain direct communications or transactional data related to the Epstein investigation on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015504.jpg
This is page 292 of an academic text authored by M. Hoffman et al., discussing evolutionary game theory. The text explores how 'Moral intuitions and ideologies' relate to Nash equilibrium, specifically utilizing the 'Hawk-Dove Game' model to explain the concept of property rights and ownership. It includes a hypothetical example involving a taxi driver to illustrate these concepts. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Epstein's funding of academic research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015502.jpg
This document appears to be page 290 of an academic paper or book chapter co-authored by M. Hoffman (likely Moshe Hoffman) regarding game theory and moral intuitions. The text discusses the efficiency of charities, using the Make-A-Wish Foundation and a fraudulent US Navy Veteran's Association as examples, and explores logical inconsistencies in moral views on murder. It introduces Game Theory, the Prisoner's Dilemma, and Nash equilibrium as tools to analyze social interactions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence during a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of academic research.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity