DOJ-OGR-00021864.jpg
639 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate brief)
File Size:
639 KB
Summary
This document is page 17 (labeled page 40 of 56 in the header) of a legal brief, likely from the government (DOJ), arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. It specifically addresses the District Court's denial of a new trial regarding 'Juror 50', who Maxwell alleges failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text cites legal precedents supporting the court's discretion to deny probing jurors post-verdict.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Contending she was deprived of a fair trial due to Juror 50's responses.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Accused of failing to accurately respond to questionnaire regarding sexual abuse history.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
Denied Maxwell's motion for a new trial.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals (2d Cir.) |
Referenced in legal citations (e.g., Rivas v. Brattesani, United States v. Ferguson).
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Document source indicated by footer 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown (Prior to filing)
Relationships (1)
Maxwell challenges the verdict based on Juror 50's questionnaire responses.
Key Quotes (3)
"Maxwell contends that she was deprived of her constitutional right to a fair and impartial jury because Juror 50 failed to accurately respond to several questions related to his history of sexual abuse"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021864.jpg
Quote #1
"We have been extremely reluctant to 'haul jurors in after they have reached a verdict in order to probe for potential instances of bias, misconduct or extraneous influences.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021864.jpg
Quote #2
"courts... should do so 'sparingly' and only in 'the most extraordinary circumstances.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021864.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document