court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Marcus McNichols
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Claus Von Bulow Appeal and Retrial | Rhode Island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys appealed Judge Colbath's ruling to the Fourth District Court of Appeals, whic... | N/A | View |
| 2021-06-30 | N/A | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby vacating conviction. | Pennsylvania | View |
| 2020-06-23 | N/A | Court granted Cosby's petition for allowance of appeal. | Pennsylvania | View |
| 2009-09-22 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel | Esquire Court Reporters, On... | View |
029.pdf
A Notice of Hearing filed in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County regarding the case State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2008-CF9381 AXX). The hearing, scheduled for May 29, 2009, before Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath, concerns a motion by a redacted non-party (represented by Bradley J. Edwards for client 'E.W.') to vacate an order sealing records and to unseal said records. The file path in the footer references 'Wild v. Epstein', suggesting the redacted party may be named Wild.
019-04.pdf
A Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Court of Virginia for attorney John Marcus McNichols. The document certifies his admission to the bar on June 7, 2004, and his current good standing as of June 29, 2023. This document was filed as an exhibit in federal case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) on June 30, 2023.
005-02.pdf
This document contains two Certificates of Good Standing filed on June 6, 2023, as part of Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR. The certificates verify that attorney Christine Marie MacKintosh is an active member in good standing of the bars of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (admitted 2002) and the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (admitted 2007).
014-02.pdf
This document contains notices for the videotaped deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel (spelled Bruhnel in one instance), scheduled for November 3, 2009, at Esquire Court Reporters in West Palm Beach, Florida. The deposition is relevant to two civil cases pending in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County: B.B. v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists numerous attorneys involved in the litigation, including Spencer Kuvin, Bradley Edwards, Jack Goldberger, and Bruce Reinhart.
014-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and a Subpoena issued by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein. It commands Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, at Esquire Court Reporters in New York City. The subpoena was issued by Brad Edwards, attorney for the plaintiff.
024.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
027-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and an associated Subpoena filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Plaintiff Jane Doe, represented by attorney Brad Edwards of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, commanded Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, in New York City. The document contains the legal notice, the subpoena addressed to Bruhel at a New York address, and standard Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding subpoenas.
006.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on May 11, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 10-80447) by Plaintiff C.L. requesting a 10-day extension to respond to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The extension was requested because Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer T. Kuvin, had a conflicting trial starting the same day in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court. The document includes a Certificate of Service listing Epstein's legal team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) and a proposed order for Judge Kenneth A. Marra to sign.
EFTA00028122.pdf
An email dated November 16, 2020, with the subject 'RE: RE: case lookup for L.A. County court?'. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but 'USAHUB-USAJournal111' is blind copied (Bcc). The document contains metadata including a Message-ID and an embedded message reference.
EFTA00028084.pdf
This document is a digital calendar entry detailing an 'Accepted: Conference' regarding Jeffrey Epstein scheduled for July 18, 2019, from 15:30 to 17:30. The location is specified as Courtroom 17B at 500 Pearl (the federal courthouse in Manhattan), which coincides with the date of Epstein's bail hearing. The attendee's name and email are redacted.
EFTA00022206.pdf
This document is a chapter from a legal textbook or guidance manual titled 'Chapter A7: Mutual Legal Assistance in Cases of Fraud,' released on July 13, 2019. It details the legal framework, international conventions, and statutory powers (such as CICA 2003 and POCA 2002) governing how the UK provides and requests assistance in cross-border fraud investigations, including freezing assets and gathering evidence. The document contains no specific information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, flight logs, or specific criminal events, but rather outlines the laws that would be applicable to such international investigations.
EFTA00022173.pdf
This document is an email chain initiated by Mark Anthony Taylor ('TheAbstraction') to the Director General of the UK National Crime Agency, forwarded by Jean James to US Attorney Geoffrey Berman. Taylor alleges a massive conspiracy connecting Russian money laundering, gold bullion fraud at Deutsche Bank, and the Epstein 'paedophile ring,' which he claims is blackmailing the UK Parliament to keep Jes Staley in charge of Barclays. The email also contains serious allegations that journalist Katherine Frisk was murdered to cover up these crimes and accuses the UK judiciary and regulatory bodies of corruption and obstruction.
EFTA00016303.pdf
This document is an email sent on September 5, 2020, to Judge Freeman's chambers regarding the civil case 'Doe v. Indyke, et al.' The email submits an attached letter from the Government supporting a stay in the proceedings. The sender and other recipients are redacted.
EFTA00014598.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorney Michael Bachner and an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's female client. Bachner formally notifies the prosecution that his client intends to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, while the prosecution pushes back against a 'blanket' invocation. The emails also reference the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) being sent as an attachment.
EFTA00011179.pdf
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of unredacted exhibits O through X, related to a Renewed Bail Motion in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The documents were filed under seal pursuant to a court order.
EFTA00010414.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.
EFTA00007097.pdf
A collection of documents regarding the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, including FBI reports, police property receipts from a search warrant at his Palm Beach residence, message logs, travel records, and legal correspondence. The file details items seized such as massage tables and photographs, travel movements via private jet, and legal motions regarding his community control conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00000155.tif
This document is a court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated November 25, 2024, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's (AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1) petition for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc. The order was issued by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the Court, following a session held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00030305.tif
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on September 17, 2009, detailing the cancellation of a deposition involving Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition was called off because Jeffrey Epstein made face-to-face contact with the plaintiff, Jane Doe 4, which her counsel, Adam Horowitz, stated intimidated her and violated a prior stipulation that Epstein would not be present. Defense counsel, Robert Critton, argued that Epstein was instructed to leave the building and planned to appear via Skype, and that the encounter would not have happened if the plaintiff and her counsel had arrived on time.
DOJ-OGR-00015796.tif
This document is a page from a court filing related to a legal proceeding involving Ghislaine Maxwell, filed with the New York County Clerk on March 5, 2020. It contains a brief excerpt from a deposition or testimony on April 9, 2009, where Maxwell confirms someone was her lawyer for the matter, followed by the conclusion of questioning by Mr. Fallek at 1:47 a.m. The document also includes a section for subscription and notarization dated 2019, suggesting a later signing of the transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00015791.tif
This document is page 4 of a legal transcript, likely a deposition, dated April 9, 2019, and filed with the New York County Clerk on March 5, 2020. It lists standard legal stipulations agreed upon by counsel regarding the Civil Practice Law and Rules (C.P.L.R.), specifically waiving the filing and certification of the original examination and agreeing to furnish copies to the witness's counsel without charge. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00015257.tif
This document is a multi-year schedule of events, lectures, and conferences from 2016 to 2021, with some events listed as 'forthcoming'. It details participation in various academic, psychological, and scientific associations and institutions across the US and internationally, often as a speaker or lecturer. Many events from 2020 and 2021 are noted as being conducted 'via zoom'.
DOJ-OGR-00014829.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 22, 2022. The defense attorney argues for a lighter sentence based on 3553(a) factors, citing Maxwell's traumatic childhood marked by her brother's coma and death, and her 'narcissistic, brutish' father. The defense also attempts to mitigate her culpability by characterizing Jeffrey Epstein as 'controlling, demanding, [and] manipulative,' claiming he cast a deceptive shadow over her adulthood.
DOJ-OGR-00014813.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a victim impact statement directed at Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker describes Maxwell as a manipulative and cruel person who used kindness to exploit others. The statement emphasizes the speaker's solidarity with other victims ('sisters'), their refusal to remain afraid, and their determination to model empowerment for their daughter.
DOJ-OGR-00014792.jpg
Page 45 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 22, 2022. The judge is issuing a ruling regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically overruling the defendant's objection to an 'undue influence' enhancement. The judge argues that applying the enhancement does not constitute 'double counting' because it addresses the specific harm of using influence to coerce a commercial sex act, distinct from the base offense of the victim being a minor.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity