DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
538 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
538 KB
Summary
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues that prior testimony from Jeffrey Epstein regarding his move to 9 East 71st Street (which he stated was around 1996) is relevant because a witness named 'Jane' claimed he lived there in 1994. The Court sustains an objection to this line of argument, referencing a prior ruling regarding the 'motive to develop' testimony.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of prior testimony and motive to develop it.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions, and sustaining an objection.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of testimony |
Quoted regarding his move date to 9 East 71st Street.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim (Pseudonym) |
Her position was that Epstein was living at the location in 1994.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00016907
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Epstein's residence; discussion centers on when he moved here.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter name (SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Dispute over timeline of residence; 'Jane' claimed he lived there in 1994 contrary to his testimony.
Key Quotes (4)
"Is it correct that you moved from the premises to 9 East 71st in or around the beginning of 1996?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
Quote #1
"I believe it is around then, but I don't know exactly when."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
Quote #2
"And the position of Jane was that he was living there in 1994."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
Quote #3
"There was motive to develop it, your Honor. That was the whole point of this litigation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document