HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
1.56 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / motion (likely a motion for protective order or motion to quash subpoena)
File Size:
1.56 MB
Summary
This document is page 7 of a legal filing arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant to a non-party identified as 'Jane Doe 3.' The filing asserts that the Defendant is harassing the non-party by requesting irrelevant personal items like diaries and childhood photos from 1999-2002, a period when she was a minor victim of sex trafficking. It cites a Newsmax interview where the Defendant admitted to tracking the non-party to Colorado to serve her and expressed a desire to jail her.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Litigant |
Seeking discovery (diaries, photos) from a non-party; accused of using subpoena power to harass and intimidate.
|
| Jane Doe 3 | Non-party / Victim |
Described as a victim of sexual trafficking who was a minor during the relevant period (1999-2002); target of the Def...
|
| Non-party | Subject of Subpoena |
Refers to Jane Doe 3.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Newsmax |
Venue where the Defendant gave an interview threatening to sue the non-party.
|
|
| Fla. 3rd DCA |
Cited in legal precedent (Peisach v. Antuna).
|
|
| Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. |
Cited in legal precedent (Citimortgage, Inc. v. Davis).
|
Timeline (2 events)
January 1, 1999 - December 31, 2002
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the Defendant claims Jane Doe 3 was 'trying to hide' to avoid service.
|
Relationships (1)
Defendant is issuing subpoenas against Jane Doe 3; Defendant expressed intent to sue her for defamation and put her in jail.
Key Quotes (5)
"Defendant is seeking personal diary information during the time this non-party was a minor child and a victim of sexual trafficking."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
Quote #1
"Photographs of Jane Doe 3 when she was a minor child are completely irrelevant to the matter before this Court."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
Quote #2
"Defendant served this subpoena demand solely to intimidate, harass and embarrass this non-party"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
Quote #3
"And we’re considering suing her for defamation as well, but right now she was trying to hide in Colorado and avoid service, but we found her and we served her and now she’ll be subjected to a deposition."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
Quote #4
"Defendant has admitted that his 'goal' is to put Jane Doe No. 3 in 'jail'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015605.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document