This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
This document is a formal certification filed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 29, 2016. It pertains to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in relation to the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca certifies his compliance with local rules and his good standing with the Colorado bar.
This document is an email chain from April 6, 2021, between USANYS staff members Alison and Ed regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Alison requests and receives approval to travel to Durango, Colorado, from April 12-15, 2021, with case agents to interview a victim and potential trial witness.
This document is a judgment from the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of Babar Ahmad and Others v. The United Kingdom, concerning the extradition of six terrorism suspects (including Abu Hamza) to the United States. The applicants argued that extradition would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights due to the risk of solitary confinement at ADX Florence and the possibility of grossly disproportionate life sentences. The Court unanimously ruled that extradition would not violate Article 3, finding that conditions at ADX Florence and the potential sentences did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment.
This document is a Public Policy Law360 email newsletter dated July 20, 2021, summarizing various legal and policy news stories. Crucially, it includes a report that Ghislaine Maxwell owes the New York State Tax Department nearly $1.6 million, identifying her as a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein. Other topics include the confirmation of Tiffany Cunningham as a Federal Circuit judge, a potential $30M fine for Robinhood, and various other legislative and judicial updates.
This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on April 21, 2016, before Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The proceedings cover motions to admit attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell pro hac vice, which the defense contested citing potential conflicts from related Florida litigation. The hearing also addresses discovery disputes, including the production of the plaintiff's medical records, tax returns, employment history, and communications with law enforcement. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
This document is a Law360 Public Policy email newsletter from April 4, 2019, summarizing various legal and political developments. Key topics include Senate rule changes for judicial nominees, the release of the Mueller Report, and a budget hearing where Labor Secretary Alex Acosta defended his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein sex crime case. The newsletter also covers antitrust cases, environmental rulings, and the 'Varsity Blues' college admissions scandal court appearances.
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs) dated January 2, 2020. The sender flags a Page Six article and mentions an NBC rumor that Ghislaine Maxwell is hiding in Colorado with wealthy ex-associates of Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
This document is a civil complaint filed on September 21, 2015, in the Southern District of New York by a redacted Plaintiff (identifiable by context as Virginia Giuffre) against Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaint alleges defamation arising from Maxwell's public statements in January 2015, where she called the Plaintiff a liar regarding allegations of sex trafficking and sexual abuse involving Jeffrey Epstein. The document details the history of the alleged abuse (1999-2002), the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and Maxwell's specific efforts to discredit the Plaintiff's reputation.
This document contains an email chain from November 20, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Laura Menninger and Jeff Pagliuca). The correspondence concerns the logistics of discovery production, including the shipment of hard drives containing witness materials to counsel in Colorado and to Maxwell at the MDC, as well as clarifications regarding Bates numbering errors. The emails provide specific FedEx tracking numbers for the shipments.
This document contains a series of photographs labeled with EFTA identification numbers (EFTA00003276 through EFTA00003295). The images depict various subjects including Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in different settings such as a private jet, horseback riding, and on a beach, as well as landscapes, buildings, and a yacht.
This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.
This document is a multi-year schedule of events, lectures, and conferences from 2016 to 2021, with some events listed as 'forthcoming'. It details participation in various academic, psychological, and scientific associations and institutions across the US and internationally, often as a speaker or lecturer. Many events from 2020 and 2021 are noted as being conducted 'via zoom'.
This document is a partial curriculum vitae or list of professional engagements spanning from 2004 to 2007, detailing various lectures, conferences, and addresses given at universities and organizations across the US, Europe, and Mexico. It includes specific dates for events, participating organizations, and locations, highlighting a professional's involvement in psychological and legal fields.
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of Colorado to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to represent the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to appear and practice pro hac vice as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists Pagliuca's contact information and confirms his good standing with the Colorado bar.
This document is a legal declaration filed on July 8, 2020, by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. Pagliuca, licensed in Colorado and a member of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., submits this declaration to support his motion for admission Pro Hac Vice. He affirms under penalty of perjury that he has no felony convictions, disciplinary actions, or denials of admission by any court.
This document is a court transcript where an attorney expresses significant doubt about the official ruling of suicide in their client's death at the MCC on August 10, 2019. The attorney cites corrupted video evidence, which is now with the FBI, and questions whether this was a pre-existing issue, drawing a parallel to another secure prison. The attorney asks the judge to investigate the death and voices frustration over receiving information from the media instead of the U.S. Attorney's office.
This document is a legal filing, page 13 of a motion in the case against Mr. Epstein, arguing for his pretrial release. It cites several legal precedents (United States v. Karni, United States v. Hanson, and Sabhnani) where courts ordered the release of defendants despite them being foreign nationals, having few ties to the U.S., facing serious charges, and substantial evidence of guilt. The core argument is that the potential for a significant sentence does not automatically preclude pretrial release.
A 1993 memorandum from Tim Ambrose at the Interlochen Center for the Arts to Jeffrey Epstein regarding the construction of a 'Scholarship Lodge.' The memo details the selection of an architect (Karen Sargent), estimated costs between $125,000 and $150,000, and a proposed location next to the Frohlich lodge. It serves as a preliminary informational update prior to a potential formal proposal.
This document is a flight log page from May and June 1993, signed by pilot David Rodgers. It details 18 flights on a Hawker Siddeley HS125-700 (Tail N909JE or N908JE) traveling between Columbus (CMH), Eagle/Vail (EGE), Santa Fe (SAF), Palm Beach (PBI), Teterboro (TEB), Atlantic City (ACY), St. Louis (CPS), and Washington D.C. (DCA). The 'Remarks' column, which typically lists passengers, is completely redacted for every entry.
This document is a Certificate of Service dated March 4, 2016, from a legal case (1:15-cv-00384-RW). Sigrid S. McCawley certifies that she electronically filed a document with the Clerk of Court and served it on Laura A. Menninger of the law firm Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. via the court's electronic filing system (CM/ECF).
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated January 25, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists contact information for two law firms, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity