DOJ-OGR-00019436.jpg

533 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / appellate brief
File Size: 533 KB
Summary

This is a page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. The text argues that Judge Preska erred by ignoring Ghislaine Maxwell's 'reliance argument.' It states that Maxwell did not plead the Fifth Amendment during her depositions because she relied on a civil protective order and the *Martindell* precedent, which protects witness testimony from being used by the Government for criminal investigations or perjury charges.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Judge Preska Judge
Accused of erring by failing to acknowledge Ms. Maxwell's reliance argument.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant / Appellant
Declined to invoke Fifth Amendment privilege during depositions relying on a protective order.
Virginia Giuffre Plaintiff / Appellee
Mentioned in case citation 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government
Referenced in the context of criminal investigations and inspecting protected testimony.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-09-24
Filing of Document 60 in Case 20-3061.
Court
Unknown (past)
Ms. Maxwell's two depositions where she declined to invoke the Fifth Amendment.
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal / Judicial Judge Preska
Brief argues Judge Preska erred in a ruling affecting Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Adversary Virginia Giuffre
Case citation Giuffre v. Maxwell.

Key Quotes (3)

"Judge Preska erred failing even to acknowledge or address Ms. Maxwell’s reliance argument."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019436.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell declined to invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination during her two depositions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019436.jpg
Quote #2
"a witness should be entitled to rely upon the enforceability of a protective order against any third parties, including the Government"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019436.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document