DOJ-OGR-00010125.jpg
344 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal case excerpt / database printout (thomson reuters/westlaw)
File Size:
344 KB
Summary
This document is a printout from a legal database (Thomson Reuters) containing the conclusion of a New York Appellate Division court opinion ('In re Conrad'). It outlines the suspension of a respondent (Conrad) from the practice of law in New York for an indefinite period, effective retroactively to December 18, 2007. The court denied a cross-motion for reinstatement, requiring an expert's evaluation of fitness for any future motion. The document bears a Department of Justice stamp (DOJ-OGR-00010125).
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Respondent |
Subject of the legal proceeding ('In re Conrad'); suspended from the practice of law in New York.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. |
New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department (Court issuing the opinion).
|
|
| State of New York |
Jurisdiction of law practice.
|
|
| Thomson Reuters |
Publisher of the legal database document.
|
|
| US Gov. |
Mentioned in copyright footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction where the suspension occurred.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Respondent suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York for an indefinite period until further order of this Court"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010125.jpg
Quote #1
"seeking reinstatement to the practice of law should be denied without prejudice to a further motion for the same relief, supported by an expert's evaluation attesting to her present fitness to practice law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010125.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document