STATE OF NEW YORK
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00030229.pdf
An email dated July 9, 2019, from the Commanding Officer of the NYPD Sex Offender Monitoring Unit to an unnamed recipient. The email confirms Jeffrey Epstein is a Level 3 sex offender in New York and outlines mandatory reporting requirements (every 90 days) and photo updates should he be released and reside in NYC.
EFTA00016865.pdf
This document is the Last Will and Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein, executed on January 27, 2012. It directs the transfer of all his property to 'The Jeffrey E. Epstein Trust One' (a pour-over will) and appoints Darren K. Indyke, Joseph Pagano, and Lawrence Newman as Executors, with Jes Staley and Andrew Farkas named as successors. The will includes broad powers for the Executors and a strict 'in terrorem' clause to disinherit any beneficiary who contests the validity of the will or the trust.
DOJ-OGR-00008283.jpg
This document is the cover page for the confidential videotaped deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell, which took place on April 22, 2016. The deposition is part of the civil lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 15-cv-07433-RWS).
DOJ-OGR-00001822.jpg
This legal document is an affidavit filed on November 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey certifies that the government attempted to negotiate in good faith with Maxwell's defense counsel for a two-week extension (from November 9 to November 23, 2020) for the production of documents seized from Jeffrey Epstein, but the parties were unable to reach an agreement. The extension was requested to allow an outside vendor to complete bates stamping and downloading of the electronic evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001683.jpg
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller affirms that the prosecution and defense have conferred on a proposed protective order but have been unable to resolve two areas of dispute. The first point of contention involves the defense's objection to the government's proposal regarding the referencing of witness and victim identities.
DOJ-OGR-00001441.jpg
This document is the first page of an Affirmation in Opposition filed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on May 27, 2021. It argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for pretrial release, citing a previous court order from April 27, 2021, that denied bail. The document establishes the legal venue in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and identifies the key legal representatives involved.
DOJ-OGR-00001318.jpg
This document is a legal affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the appeal made by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two prior District Court orders, dated December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, which denied her requests for pre-trial release.
DOJ-OGR-00000216.jpg
This legal declaration, dated May 9, 2025, is signed by Rina Danielson and notarized by Mariana Braylovskiy. It confirms the service of a brief, including an Amicus Curiae brief from the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, to a Court and other parties through various methods such as Priority Mail, email, Federal Express, and electronic filing. Rina Danielson declares under penalty of perjury that all statements within the document are true and correct.
DOJ-OGR-00020603.jpg
This document is a legal affirmation filed on January 12, 2023, by John M. Leventhal, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. He is requesting an extension of time to file an appellate brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The reasons provided for the delay are the law firm's heavy workload due to another complex case and a serious health condition affecting one of the appellate attorneys on the team.
DOJ-OGR-00001782.jpg
This document is an affidavit of certification filed on October 6, 2020, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Comey attests that the government attempted to negotiate with Maxwell's defense counsel to delay the disclosure of materials concerning victims of Jeffrey Epstein, but the defense refused to consent, leading to an inability to reach an agreement. The affidavit is filed pursuant to Local Criminal Rule 16.1 to certify this impasse to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00030541.jpg
This document is the first page of a civil complaint filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The plaintiffs are 'Jane Doe' (a minor) and her mother, suing defendants Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen for allegations involving sexual assault and abuse. The document establishes jurisdiction and venue, noting the residency of the parties involved.
DOJ-OGR-00021164.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach in the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell. The U.S. Government is requesting permission from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words to adequately respond to Maxwell's brief. The government also requests a 30-day extension for this filing, moving the deadline from May 30, 2023, to June 29, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00010125.jpg
This document is a printout from a legal database (Thomson Reuters) containing the conclusion of a New York Appellate Division court opinion ('In re Conrad'). It outlines the suspension of a respondent (Conrad) from the practice of law in New York for an indefinite period, effective retroactively to December 18, 2007. The court denied a cross-motion for reinstatement, requiring an expert's evaluation of fitness for any future motion. The document bears a Department of Justice stamp (DOJ-OGR-00010125).
DOJ-OGR-00009476.jpg
This is an affidavit from David Parse, a defendant in case S3 09 Cr. 581 in the Southern District of New York, filed on August 7, 2012. Parse states that he only became aware of a potential issue regarding a juror named Conrad being a suspended lawyer after his legal team, the Brune firm, had already filed a motion for a new trial. He specifies learning this information after a conference call on July 15, 2011, and recalls his lawyer, Theresa Trzaskoma, had previously dismissed a concern about a prospective juror having the same name during jury selection.
DOJ-OGR-00009463.jpg
This document is a professional biography or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his employment history from 1968 to 1978. It lists his roles at various law firms and organizations, including his time as a judicial clerk, associate, and executive director. The document also provides a list of selected testimonies he delivered before various congressional and professional committees between 1981 and 1988 on topics such as judicial nominations and legal reform.
DOJ-OGR-00009446.jpg
This legal document from a New York court in 2010 details a ruling in the case of "In re Conrad." The court denies the respondent's motion for reinstatement to the practice of law but does so without prejudice, allowing for a future motion. The respondent remains suspended indefinitely, effective nunc pro tunc to December 18, 2007, but a previous finding of non-cooperation from that date is vacated.
DOJ-OGR-00009445.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the First Judicial Department regarding attorney Catherine M. Conrad. The court grants the Departmental Disciplinary Committee's motion to suspend Conrad indefinitely due to a medical disability related to her admitted alcohol dependency. The court denies Conrad's cross-motion for immediate reinstatement, stating she has not yet met the burden of proving her fitness to resume the practice of law.
DOJ-OGR-00020359.jpg
This document is an affirmation by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, filed on May 27, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the renewed motion for pretrial release by defendant-appellant Ghislaine Maxwell. It references a previous court order from April 27, 2021, which had already denied Maxwell's request for bail and upheld the District Court's decision.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity