DOJ-OGR-00000134.tif
42.1 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / court filing
File Size:
42.1 KB
Summary
This document discusses a legal argument regarding the government's delay in bringing charges against 'Maxwell' and whether this delay violated due process. It cites legal precedents from the Supreme Court and other courts. Maxwell argues that the delay prejudiced her defense, specifically mentioning potential witnesses who have died, including Jeffrey Epstein.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Contends that government's delay in bringing charges prejudiced her interests and ability to prepare a defense.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Potential Witness |
Mentioned by Maxwell as a potential witness who has passed away.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court |
Referenced regarding statutory limitations and due process.
|
|
| Government |
The entity bringing charges against Maxwell.
|
Relationships (1)
Maxwell first points to several potential witnesses who have passed away. These include Jeffrey Epstein
Key Quotes (2)
""As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. Marion, the statute of limitations is 'the primary guarantee against bringing overly stale criminal charges.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000134.tif
Quote #1
""Thus, while the [Supreme] Court may not have shut the door firmly on a contention that at some point the Due Process Clause forecloses prosecution of a claim because it is too old, at most the door is barely ajar.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000134.tif
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document