DOJ-OGR-00004872.jpg
735 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court document / legal exhibit
File Size:
735 KB
Summary
This document is page 60 of 80 from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 310-1) dated July 2, 2021. The text appears to be an excerpt from a judicial opinion (referenced as [J-100-2020]) discussing the legal principles of prosecutorial discretion and due process. It argues that while prosecutors have vast discretion in charging decisions, they must still act within constitutional boundaries, citing Commonwealth v. Kratsas (Pa. 2001).
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kratsas | Defendant (Case Citation) |
Cited in Commonwealth v. Kratsas regarding due process and fair play.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
Indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
|
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania |
Implied by case citation Commonwealth v. Kratsas (Pa. 2001)
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Due process is a universal concept, permeating all aspects of the criminal justice system."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004872.jpg
Quote #1
"Like other state actors, prosecutors must act within the boundaries set by our foundational charters."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004872.jpg
Quote #2
"A prosecutor can choose to prosecute, or not."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004872.jpg
Quote #3
"Generally, no due process violation arises from these species of discretionary decision-making, and a defendant is without recourse to seek the enforcement of any assurances under such circumstances."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004872.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document