DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
1.47 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket report / memorandum opinion & order
File Size:
1.47 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a court docket concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing a Memorandum Opinion & Order dated July 30, 2020. The order resolves disputes regarding a protective order, siding with the Government to restrict Ms. Maxwell from publicly referencing alleged victims not identified in the litigation and rejecting her request to restrict potential witnesses' use of discovery materials. The court emphasizes the need to balance privacy interests of victims and witnesses against the defendant's rights and public interest.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | ||
| Christian R. Everdell | ||
| Ghislaine Maxwell | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein | ||
| Smith | ||
| Gambale | ||
| Corley |
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Deutsche Bank AG | ||
| Government | ||
| Defense | ||
| Court | ||
| S.D.N.Y. | ||
| 2d Cir. |
Timeline (3 events)
Protective Order
Memorandum Opinion & Order
Criminal trial
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (4)
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (4)
"The good cause standard "requires courts to balance several interests, including whether dissemination of the discovery materials inflicts hazard to others...""Source
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell seeks language allowing her to publicly reference alleged victims or witnesses who have spoken on the public record"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government has proposed contrary language on both of these issues."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
Quote #3
"These individuals still maintain a significant privacy interest that must be safeguarded."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019468.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document