DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg

712 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (government response)
File Size: 712 KB
Summary

This document is page 46 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The Government argues that 'Juror 50' should be allowed to review his jury questionnaire before any potential hearing to consult with counsel regarding his Fifth Amendment rights. The text notes that Juror 50 does not recall answering questions about sexual assault and discusses procedural arguments regarding subpoenas and the scope of the inquiry.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror / Witness
Subject of a potential evidentiary hearing regarding juror misconduct; requested access to his questionnaire; potenti...
The Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number 1:20-cr-00330); opposing the provision of the questionnaire to Juro...
Counsel for Juror 50 Attorney
Legal representation Juror 50 needs to consult regarding the Fifth Amendment.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
The Government
Prosecution (DOJ); arguing that Juror 50 should see his questionnaire before the hearing.
The Court
Judicial body overseeing the hearing and deciding on subpoenas.
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York (referenced in case citation).
City of Almaty
Plaintiff in a cited legal precedent.

Timeline (1 events)

Future (relative to document)
Potential Evidentiary Hearing
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the cited case.

Relationships (2)

The Government Adversarial The Defendant
Debating whether Juror 50 should receive his questionnaire in advance.
Juror 50 Attorney-Client Counsel
Text mentions Juror 50 needing to speak with his counsel regarding Fifth Amendment rights.

Key Quotes (4)

"Juror 50 should have access to his own questionnaire in advance of any such hearing so that he can speak with his counsel and assess whether he plans to invoke his rights under the Fifth Amendment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg
Quote #1
"That endeavor is not furthered by surprising Juror 50 on the stand with a document he does not seem to recall with specificity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror 50 'does not recall answering questions [in the questionnaire] regarding his prior experience with sexual assault'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg
Quote #3
"The Government agrees with the defendant that Juror 50 need not be permitted to intervene or be heard on the scope of the Court’s inquiry"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document