Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel for Juror 50

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
4
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Juror 50
Client
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-01-10 N/A Counsel for Juror 50 filed a motion to intervene and a supporting memorandum of law. Court View

DOJ-OGR-00009165.jpg

This document is page 46 of a legal filing from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The Government argues that 'Juror 50' should be allowed to review his jury questionnaire before any potential hearing to consult with counsel regarding his Fifth Amendment rights. The text notes that Juror 50 does not recall answering questions about sexual assault and discusses procedural arguments regarding subpoenas and the scope of the inquiry.

Court filing / legal brief (government response)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009163.jpg

This page is from a Government filing (Document 615) dated February 24, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text argues against the defendant's request to subpoena 'Juror 50's' social media records, citing the Stored Communications Act and privacy concerns. It also discusses a previous motion filed by Juror 50's counsel on January 10, 2022, seeking to intervene to protect the juror's rights against self-incrimination.

Legal filing / court document (government response)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009844.jpg

This document is page 46 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on March 11, 2022. It discusses the procedural handling of 'Juror 50' regarding a potential hearing about false statements on a jury questionnaire concerning sexual assault history. The Government argues that Juror 50 should be allowed to see his questionnaire before testifying to consult with counsel about Fifth Amendment rights, but agrees with the defense that the juror should not intervene in defining the scope of the inquiry.

Legal filing (court memorandum/response)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
1
As Recipient
0
Total
1

Motion to intervene

From: Counsel for Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Motion filed to protect Juror 50's privacy rights and right to avoid self-incrimination.

Legal motion
2022-01-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search