DOJ-OGR-00013521.jpg

504 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 504 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely David Rodgers). The questioning focuses on the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and a female subject (implied to be Maxwell) in the early 1990s. Rodgers testifies that he began working for Epstein in 1991 and observed 'relationship building' between the two during 1991-1992, confirming they eventually had a romantic relationship.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Rodgers Witness
Subject of cross-examination (David Rodgers, Epstein's pilot, based on case context)
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Employer of the witness; subject of relationship inquiry
Her / She Subject of Inquiry
Woman whose relationship with Epstein is being discussed (Contextually Ghislaine Maxwell given Case 1:20-cr-00330)
Unknown Attorney Interrogator
Person asking questions (Q.)

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (2 events)

1991
Witness Rodgers started working for Epstein.
Unknown
1991-1992
Period identified by witness as 'relationship building' between Epstein and the female subject.
Unknown
Jeffrey Epstein Female Subject

Relationships (2)

Rodgers Employee/Employer Jeffrey Epstein
Q. You met her soon after you started working for Epstein in 1991; right?
Jeffrey Epstein Romantic/Personal Female Subject (Maxwell)
Witness confirms they had a romantic relationship at some point, noting 'relationship building' in '91, '92.

Key Quotes (2)

"No, I kind of feel like there was a -- well, maybe some relationship building, you know, from '91, '92."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013521.jpg
Quote #1
"But at some point, they did have some sort of a romantic relationship? Let's characterize it that way. ... Yes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013521.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document