| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
her mom
|
Familial |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
him
|
Present together |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Writer
|
Social professional |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
He
|
Saw frequently |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JE
|
Purchased ticket for picked up implied |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Narrator failed to confront a close male friend about 'what happened' (implied sexual misconduct)... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Arrangement | A message was left for JC stating that 'they' would be late to pick 'her' up, arriving closer to ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Someone was picked up | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to visit 'her' and the wealthy boss. | Unknown (implied travel to ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Upcoming trip to visit 'her', funded by a ticket bought by a redacted individual. | Unknown destination ('come ... | View |
A handwritten note submitted as Exhibit B (SDNY_GM_00165986) in which the author expresses excitement about a ticket bought for them to visit a female acquaintance ('her'). The author explicitly mentions a hope that a 'very wealthy' man ('He') might help them get into or pay for college, reflecting a common pattern in accounts regarding Epstein's recruitment promises.
This document consists of handwritten notes dated November 15, 2006, detailing various tasks and events. Key entries include JE purchasing a ticket and picking someone up, discussions about holiday break assistance, annual activities at schools, and JE's idea to travel to help at a school, concluding with a note about a bathroom in a residence and a limo from the office.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between THE COURT and MS. POMERANTZ regarding the scope of expert testimony and cross-examination. The conversation centers on whether to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio on certain opinions and the Court's qualification of another expert to provide opinions on delayed disclosure in sexual abuse cases. The Court sets boundaries for cross-examination, emphasizing that it will not permit the introduction of undisclosed expert opinions.
A handwritten note, likely a diary entry, from a young person expressing excitement about a trip. A wealthy 'Boss' bought the author tickets to visit a female acquaintance ('her') whom the author hasn't seen in a year. The author explicitly mentions the man is 'very wealthy' and expresses hope that he might pay for their college education.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar discussion in a legal case. Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger, along with 'The Court,' debate the nature and admissibility of a 'prior consistent statement' and its implications for impeaching a witness. The discussion centers on a statement made by an unnamed individual to her mother, 'I wasn't raped,' and whether its elicitation would pose further legal problems.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely David Rodgers). The questioning focuses on the nature of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and a female subject (implied to be Maxwell) in the early 1990s. Rodgers testifies that he began working for Epstein in 1991 and observed 'relationship building' between the two during 1991-1992, confirming they eventually had a romantic relationship.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, likely relating to the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details a discussion regarding courthouse COVID-19 mask mandates (N95/KN95) and the handling of jury notes during deliberations. Specifically, the jury requested a transcript for 'Parkinson' (Court Exhibit 13) and had previously received supplies and a transcript for 'Matt'.
This document contains a log of text messages from January 27, 2017, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses strategizing an approach to Melinda French Gates through her company, Pivotal Ventures, with an idea for a 'female TED' conference she could patronize. The log also includes the comment 'Poor B,' likely referring to Bill Gates.
An email chain from October 2, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and Lawrence Summers (LHS). The conversation begins with Summers asking Epstein about the plausibility of Donald Trump being a cocaine user. Epstein responds by pivoting to a request for the Harvard Development Office to give 'Rothschild' a tour of Harvard that Saturday. Summers agrees to the request ('Can u have her write me') and asks for Epstein's phone number.
In this January 2015 email exchange, Jeffrey Epstein instructs David Stern to utilize 'pa people' (public affairs) to discredit a female accuser ('her'). Epstein explicitly claims that Bill Clinton was 'never on the island' and that her story regarding a dinner with Clinton and a helicopter is 'total fiction' intended to be used to 'shred her story'.
This document contains a log of digital messages from August 23, 2018, primarily sent by 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The conversation involves discussing media content described as 'x rated for violence and language,' requesting a link, and proposing a 'private screening of dharma for the power players' in New York or Europe. Notably, the sender explicitly states 'Non of my fingerprints,' suggesting a desire to remain unconnected to the event.
This document is an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein and Lawrence 'Larry' Summers from November 29-30, 2018. The two discuss plans for an event, with Summers asking about the risk of being 'staked out', and Epstein later sarcastically commenting on Summers' performance at the event, calling himself a 'pretty good wing man'. The emails demonstrate an informal and familiar relationship between the two men during this period.
This document is a transcript of an interview where the speaker describes being in a house to give a man a massage. They recount going upstairs to a bedroom and a 'humongous' bathroom, and note that the man made a very brief, four-word phone call during the massage. The interviewee also mentions their expectation of being paid for the service.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | JE | her | $0.00 | A referenced payoff: 'people will know JE paid ... | View |
| N/A | Received | JE | her | $0.00 | Mentioned in the email: 'people will know JE pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | JE | her | $0.00 | Mentioned in the email: 'people will know JE pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | her | $0.00 | Payment for school fees. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity