DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
605 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
605 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between defense counsel, the Judge, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the scheduling of jury deliberations around the Christmas holiday. The defense worries the jury might rush to judgment to avoid returning in January, while Ms. Moe argues it is premature to decide but suggests deliberations should proceed if the defense rests by the week of the 20th.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Assistant United States Attorney) |
Arguing regarding the timing of jury deliberations.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding scheduling.
|
| Unidentified Speaker | Defense Counsel (Implied) |
Raising concerns about the jury rushing to judgment due to the holiday schedule (Lines 1-15).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction location implied by court reporter footer (likely SDNY).
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Our concern is that the jury might feel we don't want to come back and would rush to judgment in a case that we know they were prepared to be here until the middle of January."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
Quote #1
"And that could inure to the disadvantage of both parties, I understand."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
Quote #2
"I think the request on the timing of deliberations is, I think, at best, premature because we don't know how long the defense case will be"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
Quote #3
"There's no reason for the jury not to be permitted to deliberate."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document