unidentified speaker
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
judge
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Days
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
my client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Zack
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker's Parents
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Aramco
|
Authority ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Benjamin Netanyahu
|
Political support confidence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
pjr
|
Intellectual academic correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Scientist
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Netanyahu
|
Political professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
He (Epstein)
|
Victim perpetrator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Shared trauma solidarity |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Shared experience |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
William Barr
|
Criticism |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A speech or presentation given by a British speaker regarding extraterrestrial origins and govern... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Social gathering | The unidentified speaker, Zack, and Haley were together watching a movie, planning to take a ride... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Speech or Presentation | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Speaker leaving their post | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between the speaker and a former CIA scientist. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication/Writing of a book | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-17 | Meeting | A meeting is scheduled for 8:30 to prepare for the jury selection logistics. | here (unspecified courtroom) | View |
| 2025-11-17 | Jury selection | A jury selection process is planned for Monday. Jurors will be assembled in two courtrooms, quest... | two different courtrooms | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | An unidentified speaker discusses the decision to excuse a juror from a case. | Unspecified Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | An attorney makes a record arguing why certain materials are not privileged. The court confirms i... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A discussion in court regarding the admissibility of evidence collected from Mr. Epstein's townho... | Court | View |
| 2021-06-15 | Legal proceeding | A court hearing where an unidentified speaker (likely an attorney) is making an argument on behal... | Court | View |
| 2020-05-05 | N/A | Sentencing hearing with Berman where a speaker (likely the judge) criticized AG Barr and the BOP ... | New York (implied) | View |
| 2020-02-10 | Court hearing | A court hearing was held where trial scheduling was discussed, as documented in this transcript f... | N/A | View |
| 2019-10-08 | N/A | Conference call with media regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's location and potential arrest. | Unknown (Teleconference) | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where victims provided statements following Epstein's death. | Federal Court (Southern Dis... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | Court hearing | Victims provide statements in a court proceeding related to Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | N/A | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court hearing regarding United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB), likely the hea... | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A discussion during a court hearing regarding a bail package, focusing on the condition of using ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Legal proceeding | An unidentified speaker in a legal setting discusses the complexities of recidivism, particularly... | unspecified court | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Interview | MP is interviewing an unidentified speaker about a past event, with another person, KB, also pres... | Unknown | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Current date of the deposition/testimony taking place. | Unspecified | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014767.jpg
This document is page 20 of a court transcript (Document 779) filed on August 22, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text records a defense attorney arguing that determining when offense conduct ended is a matter for the jury, specifically to avoid Ex Post Facto violations regarding sentencing guidelines. The speaker cites the 'Tykarsky' opinion and distinguishes the current situation from 'Apprendi' case law.
DOJ-OGR-00000710.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from September 3, 2019, following Jeffrey Epstein's death. An attorney representing victims addresses the court, acknowledging the likely motion to dismiss the criminal case but passionately arguing that the record should remain open. The speaker emphasizes the systemic betrayal of the victims and requests that those not present be allowed to submit victim impact statements so their voices are officially recorded.
DOJ-OGR-00000701.jpg
This document is page 63 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on September 3, 2019. It contains a victim impact statement delivered in court following the death of Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker describes the lasting trauma of Epstein's abuse, expresses anger at the prison system for allowing Epstein to commit suicide (thereby denying victims their day in court), and concludes by reclaiming their identity as a survivor rather than a victim.
DOJ-OGR-00000683.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, in the case against Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a victim impact statement from an unidentified woman describing the profound negative effects of Epstein's abuse on her career, relationships, and mental health, and expressing frustration that his death allowed him to escape justice. The speaker also mentions having written a 350-page book about her experiences.
DOJ-OGR-00000674.jpg
A page from a court transcript filed on September 3, 2019, featuring a statement from a victim addressing the court. The speaker discusses the complexity of their trauma following the defendant's (Epstein's) alleged suicide, calls for an investigation into his death, and criticizes the media for treating the situation as entertainment rather than focusing on the core issues of exploitation and coercion.
DOJ-OGR-00000584.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing dated July 24, 2019, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490 (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein). Courtney Wild addresses the court, identifying herself as a victim abused by Epstein starting at age 14 in Palm Beach, Florida. She urges the judge to deny Epstein bond and keep him in detention, citing public safety concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00000563.jpg
This document is page 53 of a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, concerning the detention hearing of Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A defense attorney argues to the Judge that specific financial details ('values and accounts') and evidence of seizures should remain confidential to ensure Epstein's right to a fair and impartial jury in Manhattan, citing the enormous publicity surrounding the case. The speaker mentions opposing counsel Mr. Rossmiller at the end of the page.
DOJ-OGR-00000421.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A defense attorney argues that the current indictment is an illegitimate 'do-over' of a previous investigation conducted in Florida regarding allegations from 2002-2005, which had been resolved via a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The speaker contends that revisiting these facts undermines the integrity of plea deals with the United States and begins to argue the definition of sex trafficking.
DOJ-OGR-00000395.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (SDNY). The prosecution argues that the Southern District of New York is not bound by the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg counters that the NPA provided Epstein with immunity for the conduct currently being prosecuted, including interstate travel and communications, and asserts that Epstein fulfilled the terms of that agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00018526.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It documents the conclusion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, who is then excused. The presiding officer subsequently dismisses the jury for a 15-minute afternoon break.
DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A government prosecutor addresses the Court regarding the potential calling of a rebuttal expert and the logistics of closing arguments, specifically how to present sealed exhibits to the jury without making them public. The speaker emphasizes coordination with the defense to ensure the process runs smoothly.
DOJ-OGR-00013026.jpg
This page contains a transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. A defense attorney is arguing before the judge to limit the testimony of a witness named Mr. Flatley. The argument focuses on distinguishing between factual testimony regarding metadata (which the defense accepts) and expert opinion, as well as precluding testimony regarding CDs (Compact Discs) because Flatley was only disclosed to review 'devices.'
DOJ-OGR-00017348.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records the Judge addressing the jury regarding the schedule for deliberations, stating they will proceed every day until a verdict is reached. The Judge instructs jurors to contact Ms. Williams regarding any substantial hardships due to the schedule.
DOJ-OGR-00017342.jpg
This document is page 9 of 16 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures the very end of a proceeding session where a speaker dismisses someone or calls for a break, followed immediately by a formal recess notation. The majority of the page is blank, marked 'Continued on next page'.
DOJ-OGR-00013852.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between defense counsel, the Judge, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the scheduling of jury deliberations around the Christmas holiday. The defense worries the jury might rush to judgment to avoid returning in January, while Ms. Moe argues it is premature to decide but suggests deliberations should proceed if the defense rests by the week of the 20th.
DOJ-OGR-00010251.jpg
This document is page 36 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures a legal argument regarding the cross-examination of a male witness who is a victim of sexual abuse. The defense (implied) questions the witness about an interview with a reporter named Lucia from The Independent and whether he understood the public consequences of that interview. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to the phrasing of the question regarding 'consequences' as confusing, while conceding no objection to limited follow-up on the witness's understanding of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00010182.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text captures an attorney's argument concerning 'ineffective assistance' of counsel, specifically debating whether keeping a specific juror—who was a suspended lawyer—was a strategic choice or a 'tragic misjudgment.' The latter half of the page shifts to discussing financial transactions executed in February or March specifically to generate tax losses.
DOJ-OGR-00031118.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview dated July 26, 2017, where an individual identified as MP questions an unidentified person about a past event. The interviewee expresses embarrassment and fear that their parents will find out about the incident, which involved being with two other individuals, Haley and Zack. MP attempts to establish the facts of what happened by asking the interviewee to recount the events, while also offering emotional support.
DOJ-OGR-00008716.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated December 19, 2021. It contains what appears to be a judge's instructions to a jury, emphasizing that the jury must not infer any of the judge's personal views on witness credibility or evidence. The text clearly states that deciding the issues of the case is solely the jury's responsibility.
DOJ-OGR-00011660.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, outlining the logistics for a jury selection process scheduled for the following Monday. An unidentified speaker, likely the judge, explains that jurors will be assembled in two separate courtrooms and addressed via video feed. The speaker will ask two specific questions to determine if any juror has been exposed to information about the case or feels they cannot be impartial, before proceeding with the selection of the jury pool.
DOJ-OGR-00011585.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022, containing a victim impact statement regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The speaker, who has known Maxwell for many years, characterizes her as a manipulative and cruel person who uses kindness for recognition. The victim expresses pride in standing with other survivors ('sisters') to hold Maxwell accountable and vows to pass empowerment on to her daughter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027020.jpg
This document appears to be page 12 of a speech transcript or prepared remarks. The speaker discusses the resilience of Israeli democracy, referencing the social protests of 2011 and the significant turnover in the Knesset following the 2013 elections. The speaker expresses pride in Israeli democracy and confidence in Prime Minister Netanyahu's leadership of the new government.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027014.jpg
This document appears to be page 6 of a speech or set of talking points regarding Middle East foreign policy. The text argues that a nuclear Iran poses the greatest threat to Israel and global stability, predicting that if Iran obtains nuclear weapons, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt will follow. It also references the Syrian civil war and the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation record.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023653.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a transcript produced for the House Oversight Committee, featuring a Q&A with a high-level Saudi official (contextually likely Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman) regarding the privatization of Aramco. The text details the strategy behind selling a stake in the oil giant, clarifying that the sale involves the company's value rather than the state-owned oil wells, and mentions a target sale figure of approximately 5% to raise cash for other investments.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015251.jpg
A page from a narrative document (stamped House Oversight) describing a speaker with a British accent who discusses extraterrestrial origins. The text recounts a story told by this speaker about a magnetic genius who worked for the CIA on population control technology, rebelled, and subsequently experienced a 'missing time' abduction-style event.
Aramco IPO and Saudi Economy
Discussion regarding the percentage of Aramco to be sold, the distinction between company value and state-owned wells, and the economic strategy behind the sale.
Warning about corruption and religious institutions
Unofficial call warning that religious institutions are the highest level of organized crime.
Jury selection screening questions
The speaker plans to address the assembled jurors via video feed to ask two screening questions regarding their exposure to case information and their ability to be impartial.
Victim Impact Statement
The speaker describes Ghislaine's manipulative nature, expresses solidarity with other victims ('sisters'), and declares victory over fear and powerlessness.
Victim Impact Statement
Speaker describes the trauma caused by Epstein, the disappointment regarding his suicide preventing a trial, and declares herself a survivor.
Bail conditions, specifically the use of private security...
An unidentified speaker argues for the appropriateness of a private guard as a bail condition for a wealthy individual (Mr. Epstein), citing legal precedents from the Second Circuit, including the Esposito case, and contrasting the situation with that of a poor person.
Bail conditions, specifically the use of private security...
An unidentified speaker argues for the appropriateness of a private guard as a bail condition for a wealthy individual (Mr. Epstein), citing legal precedents from the Second Circuit, including the Esposito case, and contrasting the situation with that of a poor person.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity