DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg

611 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court document)
File Size: 611 KB
Summary

This legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues for the admissibility of expert testimony regarding sex trafficking, coercive control, and the psychological relationship between pimps and victims. It cites several precedents (Kelly, Torres, Randall, Dupigny) where such testimony was permitted. Specifically, it defends the qualifications of Dr. Rocchio, a Brown University professor with 25 years of clinical experience, noting that the defendant does not contest her expertise.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Dr. Rocchio Expert Witness
Described as a leader in her field, professor at Brown University, with 25 years of clinical experience treating trau...
The Defendant Defendant
Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The text notes she does not contest Dr. Rocchio's qualifications.
Kelly Defendant in cited case
United States v. Kelly
Torres Defendant in cited case
United States v. Torres
Randall Defendant in cited case
United States v. Randall
Dupigny Defendant in cited case
United States v. Dupigny

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Brown University
Employer of expert witness Dr. Rocchio.
District Court
Referencing rulings in S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00005793.

Timeline (5 events)

2019-10-17
Transcript in United States v. Dupigny
S.D.N.Y.
2020-02-25
Transcript in United States v. Randall
S.D.N.Y.
2021-05-13
Ruling in United States v. Torres
S.D.N.Y.
2021-07-23
Letter filed in United States v. Kelly
E.D.N.Y.
2021-10-29
Document Filed
Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
Eastern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).

Relationships (2)

Dr. Rocchio Employment Brown University
teaching others as a professor at Brown University
The Defendant Legal Opponent/Witness Dr. Rocchio
The defendant does not contest that Dr. Rocchio is a qualified expert.

Key Quotes (4)

"The defendant does not contest that Dr. Rocchio is a qualified expert."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg
Quote #1
"Dr. Rocchio is a leader in her field, teaching others as a professor at Brown University, and she has approximately twenty-five years of clinical experience."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg
Quote #2
"permitting expert testimony on “[t]rauma and coercive control in the context of sex trafficking, including the psychological relationship between pimps and the women prostituted by them”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg
Quote #3
"case law quite commonly upholds this type of testimony against Daubert challenges"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document