DOJ-OGR-00004741.jpg
670 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal ruling
File Size:
670 KB
Summary
This document is page 5 of a court order filed on June 4, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's request (Request 11) for a subpoena to obtain original photographs of an alleged victim, ruling that the Government has already agreed to provide the photos in FBI possession, and that Maxwell failed to establish the relevance of the remaining photos beyond impeachment purposes, which does not satisfy Rule 17(c) requirements. The document concludes by formally denying the Defendant's motion.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Seeking original photographs to investigate authenticity; motion denied.
|
| Alleged Victim | Subject of Evidence |
Subject of the photographs in question; potential witness whose testimony scope is currently unknown.
|
| Nixon | Legal Precedent |
Referenced regarding the 'relevance requirement' for subpoenas (US v. Nixon).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Issued the ruling denying the motion.
|
|
| The Government |
Indicated possession of some photos via FBI; opposed the motion for others.
|
|
| FBI |
Possesses original versions of a subset of the requested photographs.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-06-04
Court denies Defendant's motion for a subpoena regarding original photographs.
Court (Document Filing)
Relationships (2)
The Government indicated that... photographs are in the FBI’s possession.
Maxwell seeking photos of alleged victim for impeachment/authenticity checks.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Defendant’s motion for an order authorizing the subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) is DENIED."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004741.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell seeks these materials to inspect them prior to trial in order to investigate their authenticity."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004741.jpg
Quote #2
"The only discernible theory of relevance as to this request is impeachment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004741.jpg
Quote #3
"impeachment evidence falls outside the scope of Rule 17(c), the request fails to meet Nixon’s relevance requirement."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004741.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document