DOJ-OGR-00022035.jpg
773 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / memorandum of law (argument section)
File Size:
773 KB
Summary
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) dated April 9, 2020, related to defendant Michael Thomas (one of the guards charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). The text argues that Michael Thomas is entitled to the complete Inspector General's Report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)E, citing various legal precedents (Armstrong, Rigas, McGuinness, Giffen) to define 'material' evidence necessary for defense preparation.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Thomas | Defendant |
The defendant requesting the Inspector General's Report to prepare his defense.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Inspector General |
Entity that produced a report requested by the defense.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the footer 'DOJ-OGR' and the nature of the prosecution.
|
|
| Federal Courts |
Referenced regarding their view on the term 'material'.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. (Southern District of New York) |
Jurisdiction cited in legal precedents.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York, cited in case law.
|
Relationships (1)
Argument regarding discovery requests to prepare defense against the government.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Complete Inspector General’s Report, as Well as the Other Reports Requested Are Necessary for Michael Thomas to Prepare His Defense"Source
DOJ-OGR-00022035.jpg
Quote #1
"[I]t could be used to counter the government's case or to bolster a defense"Source
DOJ-OGR-00022035.jpg
Quote #2
"Evidence is material if its pretrial disclosure will enable a defendant to alter significantly the quantum of proof in his favor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022035.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document