Federal Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-08-21 | Legal proceeding | The court ordered the government to provide petitioners with a copy of the NPA subject to a prote... | Federal Court | View |
| 2008-07-01 | N/A | A victim filed an emergency petition for enforcement of rights under the CVRA. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal event | The Federal Court orders the USAO to disclose the NPA to victims, and the USAO sends a revised vi... | N/A | View |
EFTA00027927.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019, forwarding a letter from Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case 'Jeffrey Epstein 19 cr 490'. The email was sent two days after Epstein's death and involves recipients at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The specific content of Judge Berman's letter is contained in the attachment 'Aug_12_letter.pdf', which is not visible in this image.
EFTA00026678.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between attorney Paul Cassell (representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely a federal prosecutor). Cassell invokes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to request that Epstein be detained for the safety of the victims and to oppose any 'private jail' arrangement for Epstein's release. The recipient confirms they will convey these concerns to the Court.
EFTA00025441.pdf
This document is a Law360 email alert dated July 24, 2020, summarizing recent legal developments. The main story reports that Ghislaine Maxwell failed to secure gag orders against prosecutors and lawyers (specifically Boies) and failed to prevent the unsealing of documents in a defamation suit. A secondary article mentions sanctions against copyright lawyer Richard Liebowitz.
EFTA00021937.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger) dated July 27, 2020. The prosecution requests a 'meet and confer' to discuss a protective order, specifically challenging the defense's desire to name victims in public filings rather than using pseudonyms. The email also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00020762.pdf
This document is a declaration by a Jane Doe victim executed in January 2015, detailing her abuse by Jeffrey Epstein between 2002 and 2005 in Palm Beach. She describes being paid for sex and recruitment, being intimidated into silence through fear of losing her son, and initially using an attorney provided by Epstein to give favorable statements. The declaration outlines her transition to cooperating with prosecutors after hiring Brad Edwards in 2008, her exclusion from the plea deal process, and her realization that Epstein received lenient treatment due to his wealth and power.
EFTA00018370.pdf
This document appears to be an excerpt from a Curriculum Vitae or a disclosure list for Professor Gail S. Goodman, detailing her history of providing expert testimony in federal court. It lists specific criminal cases (US v. Defendant) alongside the jurisdiction (Washington DC, Portland, New Mexico, San Francisco) and the associated US Attorney's office, though the specific attorney names are redacted.
EFTA00014116.pdf
An email chain from August 2008 between Alex Acosta and USAFLS staff discussing a letter from victims' attorney Brad Edwards. The emails reveal the prosecution's internal justification for not consulting victims before the plea deal, stating they did not believe the Crime Victims Rights Act applied and feared compromising them as witnesses. Acosta explicitly notes Epstein's argument that the victims were motivated by money.
EFTA00013999.pdf
An email chain from August 7, 2008, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAFLS) and defense attorney Roy Black. The government notifies Black that Epstein's victims have sued the U.S. and are seeking the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The government plans to oppose this disclosure based on confidentiality but requests a copy of the agreement version filed in state court by Jack Goldberger to ensure consistency if forced to disclose.
EFTA00013568.pdf
This document is an email dated July 18, 2008, from an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney in West Palm Beach. It confirms that a victim notification letter has been filed in court regarding a federal civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email notes that approximately 10 letters have been sent to victims and that the FBI's victim coordinator is updating addresses to send the remainder the following Monday.
EFTA00010148.pdf
This document is an email sent on November 30, 2018, with the subject 'Epstein'. The sender and recipients are redacted. The body of the email inquires about a trial scheduled for December 4, specifically asking for clarification on whether the case is against the DOJ or Epstein, and if it is being held in state or federal court.
DOJ-OGR-00014879.jpg
This document is page 3 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on January 15, 2025. The Judge discusses the necessity of sealing portions of the proceedings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and outlines the schedule for addressing 'Daubert' issues first. The Judge also notes a high response rate for jury summons, with 565 prospective jurors having filled out questionnaires in two days.
DOJ-OGR-00008624.jpg
This document is page 86 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains a table of contents for Jury Instructions 24 through 48, outlining legal parameters for charges including Sex Trafficking of a Minor, Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws, Aiding and Abetting, and procedural instructions regarding witness credibility and evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00001666.jpg
This is page 3 of a government filing dated July 28, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government argues against the defense's request to publicly name victims/witnesses, calling the defense's argument 'absurd' and 'offensive' particularly regarding the suggestion that victims derive a 'benefit' from public identification. The document outlines the proposed protective order which would allow defense counsel to discuss identities privately but prohibits public dissemination to prevent harassment and intimidation.
DOJ-OGR-00020892.jpg
This document is a transcript page (likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings, indicated by 'M38TMAX1') regarding 'Juror 50'. The Court grants Juror 50 'use immunity' following an assertion of Fifth Amendment privileges, protecting them from prosecution based on their testimony provided they do not commit perjury. The Court also explicitly instructs the juror not to reveal information regarding jury deliberations or thought processes during the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00020511.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail on March 22, 2021, and various orders regarding the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically referencing Exhibit 11 and transcripts from the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The docket also records a subpoena request directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, with the court requiring notice be given to those victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020482.jpg
This document is page 5 of 8 from the Judgment in a Criminal Case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It outlines twelve standard conditions of supervision for her release, including requirements to report to a probation officer, maintain employment, refrain from criminal associations, and prohibitions against owning weapons or acting as an informant. The document bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00020482.
DOJ-OGR-00002385(1).jpg
This document is page 3 of a Protective Order filed on March 4, 2016, in the civil case between Virginia Roberts Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. The document contains redline edits that significantly expand the scope of the order to protect the privacy of 'any non-party that was subject to sexual abuse' and explicitly allows confidential information to be used in 'investigations by law enforcement.' The text defines what constitutes confidential information and begins listing who may access it.
DOJ-OGR-00002295.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Court should sever the Perjury Counts (Counts 5-6) from the Mann Act Counts (Counts 1-4) pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 8(a) and 14. The defense contends that a joint trial would unfairly prejudice the jury against Maxwell by attacking her credibility regarding 'salacious topics,' potentially causing a conviction on the sex trafficking charges based on character attacks rather than evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00002295(1).jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Court should sever the Perjury Counts (Counts 5-6) from the Mann Act Counts (Counts 1-4) pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 8(a) and 14. The defense contends that a joint trial would unfairly prejudice the jury against Maxwell by attacking her credibility regarding 'salacious topics,' potentially causing a conviction on the sex trafficking charges based on character attacks rather than evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00022027.jpg
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a legal filing from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (the federal case associated with Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on April 9, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' section listing citations to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 16 regarding discovery) and the corresponding page numbers where they appear in the full brief. The document bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00022027.
DOJ-OGR-00021955.jpg
This document is page 2 of a Protective Order filed on December 16, 2019, in the criminal case against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas (the guards on duty when Jeffrey Epstein died). The order outlines restrictions on 'Protected Materials' provided during discovery, stipulating they can only be used for defense purposes and cannot be disclosed to third parties except as specifically allowed. The defendants consented to this order.
DOJ-OGR-00021502.jpg
This document appears to be the final signature page (Page 4 of 4) of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Jeffrey Epstein. It details Epstein's waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to a grand jury indictment, consenting instead to be charged via Information. The document includes signature blocks for Epstein, his lawyer Roy Black, and Assistant US Attorney A. Marie Villafaña (under US Attorney R. Alexander Acosta), though the date fields are blank in this version. The header indicates this document was filed as an exhibit in later court cases in 2021 and 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00021480.jpg
This document is an excerpt from an OPR report (DOJ-OGR-00021480) analyzing whether Prosecutor Villafaña committed professional misconduct by omitting information about the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) when speaking with victims and attorney Edwards. OPR concluded that her conduct did not amount to making affirmative false statements, noting that she believed the investigation was ongoing until Epstein's June 2008 state plea and had advocated for charging him. The text cites Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) and related case law regarding candor and omissions.
DOJ-OGR-00021441.jpg
This legal document details events from August to September 2008 concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on victim notifications. It describes how the Federal Court ordered the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) to disclose the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to victims and their attorneys. The document also discusses the USAO sending a revised notification letter after Epstein's attorneys objected to language in a previous version.
DOJ-OGR-00021198.jpg
This document is a table of contents from a legal filing related to Case 22-1426, filed on June 29, 2023. It outlines the structure of an analysis concerning the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), detailing a timeline of events from 2007-2011 involving victim notifications by the FBI and USAO, subsequent litigation, and an examination of whether officials violated standards by entering a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) without consulting victims. The document focuses on statutory provisions, department policies, and professional conduct rules.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity