DOJ-OGR-00021865.jpg
607 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
607 KB
Summary
This page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) discusses a Rule 33 motion for a new trial based on 'Juror 50's' alleged erroneous responses during jury selection (voir dire). The text argues that the District Court correctly applied the 'McDonough' standard, finding the juror's errors were not deliberate and that accurate answers would not have led to a dismissal for cause. It also notes that Ghislaine Maxwell did not challenge other jurors who had disclosed histories of sexual abuse.
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
Applied the McDonough standard and ruled on the Rule 33 motion.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Cited in footnotes regarding judicial standards.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Key Quotes (3)
"Under McDonough, a party seeking a new trial 'must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021865.jpg
Quote #1
"Juror 50’s erroneous responses during voir dire were 'not deliberately incorrect'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021865.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell did not challenge the inclusion of other jurors who disclosed past experience with sexual abuse, assault, or harassment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021865.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document