DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg

738 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
6
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (court order/memorandum opinion)
File Size: 738 KB
Summary

This document is Page 43 of a legal filing (Document 615) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's request to compel the production of 'Juror 50's' (Scotty David) private emails and social media records (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram). The prosecution characterizes the defense's request as an inadmissible 'fishing expedition' and argues that the juror's post-trial media interviews or comments on a victim's Twitter post do not justify invading his privacy regarding pre-trial or during-trial communications.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a defense request to compel production of communications regarding his jury service and potential bias.
The Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case 1:20-cr-00330), who is requesting the juror's communications.
Ianniello Case Law Reference
Cited in legal precedent (866 F.2d at 543-44).

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Facebook
Social media platform mentioned in discovery request.
Twitter
Social media platform mentioned in discovery request.
LinkedIn
Social media platform mentioned in discovery request.
Instagram
Social media platform mentioned in discovery request.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
The Court
The judicial body presiding over the case.

Timeline (2 events)

Before/During Trial
Defense alleges potential improper communications by Juror 50.
Unknown
Post-trial
Juror 50 made public statements and media interviews regarding his jury service.
Media/Online

Relationships (2)

Juror 50 Adversarial/Legal The Defendant
Defendant is seeking to compel Juror 50's private communications to prove bias.
Juror 50 Communication Victim
Juror 50 made a public comment on a victim's public Twitter post.

Key Quotes (4)

"It is hard to imagine a request more likely to “subject[] juries to harassment” and “inhibit juryroom deliberation,” id. at 543, than the defendant’s request to compel production of a juror’s emails and other written communications"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
Quote #1
"This is a classic fishing expedition and should not be permitted."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
Quote #2
"Juror 50’s public comment on a victim’s public Twitter post after trial does not give the defense license to compel his private communications"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
Quote #3
"even if he received compensation for post-trial interviews that says nothing whatsoever about whether the Court would have struck him for cause before trial based on his alleged experience with sexual abuse."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document