Relationship Network
EFTA00038980.pdf
This document is a law enforcement travel check and open-source intelligence report marked For Official Use Only (FOUO). It details a subject's last known flight from Boston to London in December 2017 and includes screenshots of a LinkedIn profile (possibly belonging to 'Lucy Clive') and other web searches relating to Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew.
EFTA00038908.pdf
This document is a printed LinkedIn profile for an individual based in Irvine, California, dated October 8, 2019. The profile details a work history that includes a significant role from October 1996 to January 2003 managing '7 personal estates worldwide' and '11 corporate apartments' for a 'high profile, high net worth Entrepreneur,' duties which strongly align with the known estate management structure of Jeffrey Epstein. The individual also lists experience in investment advisory firms and real estate, along with an MBA from Strayer University.
EFTA00038906.pdf
An email chain from December 2021 involving attorney Eric Lerner of Lerner & Lerner, P.C. Lerner contacts a recipient regarding a character witness recently called by the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Lerner alleges that this witness, despite testifying positively for Maxwell, was actually responsible for scheduling sexual encounters between his client (a victim aged 14-15 at the time) and Jeffrey Epstein between 2001 and 2002. Lerner notes his client previously sued this witness but dropped the suit as a condition of a settlement with the Epstein Estate.
EFTA00037243.pdf
This document is an email chain from May 27, 2020, between Mark L. Epstein and an FBI agent. Mark forwards a screenshot of threatening messages he received on LinkedIn from a user named 'Mim Mim'. The messages claim that Mark's brother (Jeffrey Epstein) made a mistake by wanting to 'tell the court everything' and threaten to kill one of Mark's children in 48 hours if he does not identify 'the boss'. The FBI agent responds asking for the specific URL of the LinkedIn profile to aid in tracing the user.
EFTA00032906.pdf
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
EFTA00029606.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
EFTA00025443.pdf
This document is 'The Daily 202' newsletter from The Washington Post dated July 23, 2020. It covers various current events including the start of the MLB season during the pandemic, federal agents in Portland tear-gassing Mayor Ted Wheeler, and COVID-19 statistics. The only connection to the Epstein case is a brief mention in the 'Videos of the day' section noting Stephen Colbert's reaction to President Trump's recent message to Ghislaine Maxwell.
EFTA00018654.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.
DOJ-OGR-00008628.jpg
This document is Page 90 of 167 from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 3', which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case via any electronic means or social media (listing specific platforms like Facebook and Twitter) and bans outside research. The instruction emphasizes that deliberations must occur only within the jury room and verdicts must be based solely on evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00008548.jpg
This document is page 10 of 167 from a court filing dated December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 3, which strictly prohibits jurors from using social media, the internet, or electronic devices to communicate about the case or conduct outside research during deliberations. The instruction emphasizes that the verdict must be based solely on evidence presented in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00016131.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, in which a judge is instructing the jury on their conduct. The judge strictly prohibits jurors from discussing the case with anyone, including each other, until deliberations, and forbids the use of any electronic devices or social media for communication or research related to the case. The instructions emphasize the need to keep an open mind and base their verdict solely on the evidence presented in court.
DOJ-OGR-00021541.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 25, 2022, details a court's order regarding an inquiry into the truthfulness of answers provided by Juror 50. The court sets a deadline of March 1, 2022, for the parties to submit proposed questions for a hearing. The court denies the Defendant's broad subpoena requests for Juror 50's communications, social media history, and other records, labeling them a "vexatious, intrusive, unjustified, and a fishing expedition."
DOJ-OGR-00009162.jpg
This document is Page 43 of a legal filing (Document 615) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's request to compel the production of 'Juror 50's' (Scotty David) private emails and social media records (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram). The prosecution characterizes the defense's request as an inadmissible 'fishing expedition' and argues that the juror's post-trial media interviews or comments on a victim's Twitter post do not justify invading his privacy regarding pre-trial or during-trial communications.
DOJ-OGR-00009057.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details requests for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50." It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror. The document also describes how this juror and another juror, who both allegedly failed to disclose they were victims of childhood sexual abuse, discussed these experiences during deliberations, potentially influencing the verdict rendered by all 12 jurors.
DOJ-OGR-00009028.jpg
This document is a court filing from February 2022 containing screenshots of an Instagram account ('thisbeartravels') belonging to Scotty David (identified as Juror No. 50). The posts reveal David publicly discussing his role as a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial and mentioning his use of therapy to deal with the stress of the case. The filing notes that Juror No. 50 deleted his social media accounts (Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn) shortly after these posts were discovered.
DOJ-OGR-00009841.jpg
This legal document argues against a defendant's request to compel the production of private communications from 'Juror 50', including emails and social media content from platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The author contends that the requests are an improper and invasive 'fishing expedition' that seeks inadmissible evidence, would harass the juror, and could inhibit future jury deliberations. The document urges the Court to reject all of the defendant's specific requests for information regarding the juror's communications, potential media payments, and social media activity.
DOJ-OGR-00009748.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on March 11, 2022, outlines a request for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50". It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror regarding their jury service. The document also discusses a hearing concerning the misconduct, which involves another juror who also allegedly failed to disclose being a victim of childhood sexual abuse, potentially implicating the entire jury's verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00014586.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing a judge's instructions to a jury. The judge clarifies that only witness answers and admitted exhibits constitute evidence, not lawyers' questions or the judge's own rulings. The document also contains "Instruction No. 3," which strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone using any electronic devices or social media platforms during their deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00005374.jpg
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00008714.jpg
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 3) for a jury in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It strictly prohibits jurors from communicating about the case with anyone or conducting outside research using any electronic devices, the internet, or social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter. The instruction emphasizes that jurors must base their verdict solely on evidence presented in the courtroom and may only discuss the case with fellow jurors in the jury room during deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00011686.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It contains instructions from the Judge to the jury regarding their conduct, specifically forbidding them from discussing the case with one another or outside parties until deliberations begin. The text explicitly lists various communication technologies and social media platforms (Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc.) that jurors are prohibited from using to discuss the trial.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031428.jpg
This document is an email chain forwarding a Miami Herald article titled "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case." The article reports that the Justice Department reassigned the Epstein victims' rights case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Atlanta following the recusal of Miami federal prosecutors. It also references a video of Attorney General nominee William Barr pledging to review the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022187.jpg
An email forwarded to 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) on October 13, 2016, containing a LinkedIn message from CNN reporter Melanie Hicken to an unnamed individual identified as 'Epstein's pilot.' Hicken requests an off-the-record discussion or anonymous documentation regarding allegations that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump visited Epstein's private island and engaged in sexual relations with minors. The reporter explicitly states they are focusing on Trump and Clinton rather than Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022180.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (page 283) included in House Oversight Committee files. It details the post-Epstein lives of several 'girls,' including 'Mary' (arrested for shoplifting in 2010) and Wendy Dobbs (pursuing nursing/hospitality). It establishes a financial link between Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, and a woman named Marcinko (alias Sarah Kensington), noting that Mark owned the building where she lived.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026583.jpg
This document is an annotated screenshot of a Google search results page for 'Jeffrey Epstein' from early 2013, prepared by a reputation management professional. The annotations track the ranking movements of various web pages compared to a January 25th benchmark, explicitly mentioning 'linkbuilding' efforts to promote Epstein's foundations and suppress negative news articles, including one involving Prince Andrew. The document originated from the House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity