DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief (page 18 of 26)
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It discusses a Rule 33 motion regarding Juror 50's erroneous responses during voir dire in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The text argues that under the 'McDonough' standard, a new trial is not warranted because the District Court found the juror's errors were not deliberate and would not have resulted in a strike for cause.
People (2)
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court |
Applied the McDonough standard and ruled on Juror 50's credibility.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Cited in footnote 33 regarding the standard for invalidating trial results.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated in footer stamp).
|
|
| McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. |
Part of the case citation establishing the legal standard.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Key Quotes (4)
"Under McDonough, a party seeking a new trial “must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
Quote #1
"The District Court... determined that Juror 50’s erroneous responses during voir dire were “not deliberately incorrect”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
Quote #2
"“he would not have been struck for cause if he had provided accurate responses to the questionnaire.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
Quote #3
"Maxwell did not challenge the inclusion of other jurors who disclosed past experience with sexual abuse, assault, or harassment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document