DOJ-OGR-00011658.jpg

516 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 516 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details a legal argument between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), the defense (Mr. Everdell), and the Judge regarding jury instructions for a Mann Act conspiracy count. The specific issue involves whether sexual conduct was illegal under New Mexico law versus New York law, and the age of consent regarding a specific witness.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Attorney (Prosecution)
Agreeing with the Court regarding the Mann Act conspiracy count logic.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding jury charges and legal jurisdiction of sexual conduct.
Mr. Everdell Attorney (Defense)
Arguing that the government is raising an 'eleventh-hour issue' regarding New Mexico law.
Unnamed Witness Witness/Victim
Described as being under the age of consent in New York in her telling.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding jury instructions/charges related to the Mann Act conspiracy count and jurisdiction differences between New Mexico and New York laws.
Courtroom (implied SDNY)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location where sexual conduct occurred; discussion of state laws.
Location referenced regarding age of consent laws and potential confusion by defense counsel.

Relationships (2)

Mr. Rohrbach Professional The Court
Legal discourse in court setting.
Mr. Everdell Professional The Court
Legal discourse in court setting.

Key Quotes (3)

"that witness, in her telling, was under the age of consent in New York, and therefore it goes to the conspiracy to -- the Mann Act conspiracy count."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011658.jpg
Quote #1
"I do think a charge is necessary, but it has to be correct, and it sounds like it may not be entirely correct as written."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011658.jpg
Quote #2
"On the point about not being illegal under New Mexico law, this is really an eleventh-hour issue the government is raising."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00011658.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document