HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115.jpg

2.52 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic text / scientific publication page
File Size: 2.52 MB
Summary

This document is a page (199) from an academic or scientific book regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Cognitive Science. It discusses 'Theory of Mind,' comparing philosophical approaches (Theory Theory vs. Simulation Theory) and how the 'CogPrime' AI system might achieve this through embodied experience and 'PLN' (Probabilistic Logic Networks). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to scientists and AI research.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Davidson Researcher/Author
Cited as [Dav84], supports belief that theory of mind depends on linguistic ability.
Dennett Researcher/Author
Cited as [Den87], supports belief that theory of mind depends on linguistic ability.
Premack Researcher
Cited as [PW78], challenged prevailing stance on theory of mind using primates.
Woodruff Researcher
Cited as [PW78], challenged prevailing stance on theory of mind using primates.
Gordon Researcher
Cited as [Gor86], postulates theory of mind relates to cognitive simulations.
Piaget Psychologist
Mentioned in the chapter header regarding stages of development.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
CogPrime
An Artificial General Intelligence system discussed throughout the text.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115' at the bottom.

Relationships (1)

Premack Research Partners Woodruff
Cited together as [PW78] regarding primate experiments.

Key Quotes (3)

"We have thought through the details by CogPrime system should be able to develop theory of mind via embodied experience"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115.jpg
Quote #1
"In an uncertain AGI context, both theories and simulations are grounded in collections of uncertain implications"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115.jpg
Quote #2
"Recognizing 'embodied agent' as a category, however, is a problem fairly similar to recognizing 'block' or 'insect' or 'daisy' as a category."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document