Piaget
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
His lawyers (authors of the text)
|
Academic citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Vygotsky
|
Academic critic |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
This document is page 309 from a book or academic paper titled '17.2 Measuring Incremental Progress Toward Human-Level AGI'. The text discusses the challenges of measuring progress in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), arguing against simple metrics like the Turing Test in favor of a competency-based approach inspired by human cognitive development. It references psychologists Piaget and Vygotsky and outlines a roadmap for defining AGI competencies. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225', indicating it was collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee, likely in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's known funding of and connections to the scientific community and AI research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013133.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an academic book or paper discussing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and ethical development theories (citing Piaget, Perry, and Gilligan). It specifically mentions 'CogPrime-type AGI systems' and 'Ethical Synergy'. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence during a Congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or involvement with scientists and AI research institutions (such as the MIT Media Lab or the Edge Foundation).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013131.jpg
This document appears to be page 215 from an academic book or paper discussing 'Ethical Synergy' and 'An Integrative Approach to Ethical Development.' The text explores the creation of 'moral, ethical artificial general intelligence' (AGI) by synthesizing the psychological theories of Kohlberg (justice-based ethics) and Gilligan (care-based ethics). The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013131' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community and AI research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013128.jpg
This document is a page (212) from an academic text regarding 'The Engineering and Development of Ethics,' specifically within the context of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It features tables outlining Kohlberg's stages of moral development and discusses applying these stages to AGI systems like 'CogPrime' using uncertain inference. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was gathered as evidence during a congressional investigation, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research and AI/AGI projects.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013127.jpg
This document page discusses ethical synergy in AGI, defining procedural, attentional, and intentional memory in an ethical context. It further explores the stages of development of declarative ethics, primarily focusing on Lawrence Kohlberg's "ethics of justice" model and its relation to cognitive development theories by Piaget and others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013115.jpg
This document is a page (199) from an academic or scientific book regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Cognitive Science. It discusses 'Theory of Mind,' comparing philosophical approaches (Theory Theory vs. Simulation Theory) and how the 'CogPrime' AI system might achieve this through embodied experience and 'PLN' (Probabilistic Logic Networks). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to scientists and AI research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013107.jpg
This document appears to be a page (p. 191) from an academic book or paper discussing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and psychology. It analyzes Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development, specifically the 'Formal' stage, and contrasts it with the theories of Vygotsky and others regarding learning continuity and social context. It references 'CogPrime' (an AGI architecture associated with Ben Goertzel) and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013107' bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in the context of Epstein's connections to scientists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013106.jpg
This document outlines stages of cognitive development, specifically focusing on Piagetian and post-Piagetian theories. It includes a diagram illustrating a hierarchy from Infantile to Full self-modification stages and provides detailed definitions for the Infantile, Preoperational, and Concrete stages.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025963.jpg
This document is a printout of an email thread between cognitive scientist Joscha Bach and Jeffrey Epstein from July 2016. Bach apologizes to Epstein for an argument that occurred earlier that day involving Noam Chomsky, discussing the nuances of their disagreement regarding linguistics and cognitive development theories. The email contains controversial racial theories regarding cognitive development and references Joi Ito's views on public communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025957.jpg
An email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein following a meeting that included Noam Chomsky. Bach apologizes for his performance during the meeting and elaborates on his theories regarding cognitive science, specifically discussing genetic developmental switches, comparisons between human and ape brain development, and controversial racial comparisons regarding cognitive versus motor development.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025951.jpg
In this email from July 2016, cognitive scientist Joscha Bach writes to Jeffrey Epstein to apologize for his behavior during a debate with Noam Chomsky earlier that day, thanking Epstein for his support. Bach details his disagreements with Chomsky's linguistic theories and critiques Joi Ito's communication style, describing Ito as unoriginal but politically savvy. The email cuts off while Bach is discussing racial differences in child motor development.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026416.jpg
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein dated July 10, 2016. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent intellectual discussion with Noam Chomsky, shares his theories on linguistics and child development, and provides a separate, critical analysis of Joi Ito's public communication methods. The email contains controversial statements regarding racial differences in child development and indicates a collegial relationship between Bach and Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026409.jpg
This document is an email from AI researcher Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016. Bach discusses a recent academic debate he had with 'Noam' (likely Chomsky), analyzes the communication style of 'Joi' (likely Ito), and presents his controversial theories on child development and cognition. The email, marked as evidence from a House Oversight investigation, highlights the intellectual and social circle Epstein cultivated.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026402.jpg
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016, with a brief follow-up message. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent discussion with Noam Chomsky and proceeds to detail his theories on cognitive development, including controversial claims about racial differences. The follow-up note reflects on the purpose of communication, citing 'Joi' (likely Joi Ito).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026396.jpg
This document is an essay presenting a theory on human cognitive development, suggesting it is based on simple 'developmental switches' rather than complex innate circuits. The author makes controversial comparisons between developmental speeds and IQ across different races and draws parallels to machine learning, citing a 2015 incident where Google's AI misidentified Black people. Despite the 'Epstein-related' prompt, the document's content does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or any known associates; its only potential connection is a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' document label.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity