DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg

624 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (testimony)
File Size: 624 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), who is explaining the scientific peer review process and her experience serving on editorial boards for psychology journals. The document appears to be part of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial records.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Loftus Witness / Expert Witness
Testifying under direct examination regarding scientific methodology, peer review, and her experience on editorial bo...
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interrogator
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
Jury Audience
The group being addressed by the witness's explanation.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Loftus Attorney

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and court reporter name.

Relationships (1)

Loftus Professional/Editorial Various Scientific Journals
Witness states: "I've served on the editorial board of many journals."

Key Quotes (2)

"Journals that are peer-reviewed journals generally have an editorial board."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
Quote #1
"But over the years, many of the major journals in the field of psychology."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013969.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document