DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg

659 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (page 56 of internal document, page 63 of 66 in filing)
File Size: 659 KB
Summary

This document is page 63 of a legal filing (Document 642) from March 11, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It argues that submissions by 'Juror No. 50' should remain sealed because they lack merit, the juror has shown a 'lack of reliability' and 'appetite for publicity,' and releasing them could compromise an ongoing investigation into juror misconduct. The document concludes with a legal argument regarding the importance of *voir dire* in ensuring an impartial jury.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Juror No. 50 Juror / Subject of Investigation
Accused of misconduct, questionable merit in submissions, lack of reliability, and appetite for publicity.
PAE Judge (Paul A. Engelmayer)
Implied by Case ID 1:20-cr-00330-PAE

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court
Conducting investigation into juror misconduct.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (2 events)

2022-03-11
Filing of Document 642 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court Docket
Defense Counsel Prosecution Court
Ongoing
Investigation into juror misconduct
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Cited in case law (Northern District of New York).

Relationships (1)

Juror No. 50 Subject of Investigation The Court
Text mentions 'ongoing investigation by the parties and the Court into juror misconduct.'

Key Quotes (4)

"Juror No. 50 has demonstrated a lack of reliability and an appetite for publicity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg
Quote #1
"The submissions by Juror No. 50 have questionable merit, have not been ruled upon, and implicate an ongoing investigation by the parties and the Court into juror misconduct."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg
Quote #2
"Documents regularly remain sealed where public release would “compromis[e] the interest in the integrity and security of [an] investigation”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg
Quote #3
"The purpose of voir dire is “to expose bias or prejudice on the part of veniremen,”"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009755.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document