DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg

648 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size: 648 KB
Summary

This document is a letter dated February 21, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim explains that attached documents concerning a Motion for a New Trial contain proposed redactions to protect the integrity of an inquiry into 'Juror 50's conduct' and to protect the privacy of other jurors involved in the voir dire process.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Bobbi C. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Author of the letter representing Ghislaine Maxwell
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Recipient of the letter, presiding judge
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the case (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of inquiry regarding conduct during voir dire process

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
Author's firm
United States District Court
Venue of the case
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)

Timeline (2 events)

February 21, 2022
Filing of Document 606 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
New York, NY
Unknown (Prior to Feb 21, 2022)
Voir dire process involving Juror 50
Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Address of Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim
Address of United States Courthouse

Relationships (2)

Bobbi C. Sternheim Legal Counsel Ghislaine Maxwell
Sternheim writes on behalf of the defense in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Alison J. Nathan Judge/Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Case caption and salutation

Key Quotes (3)

"The proposed redactions are intended to ensure the integrity of the fact-finding process to uncover the truth surrounding Juror 50’s conduct during the voir dire process"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #1
"preserve specific factual information developed by the defense that has not been publicly reported"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #2
"risks compromising the integrity of the jury selection process and the willingness of potential jurors to disclose personal information"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008975.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document