Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
21-770_Documents%20Pt%202%20of%203.pdf
This document is a compilation of legal filings from late 2020 to early 2021 concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's repeated attempts to secure release on bail pending her trial for sex trafficking conspiracy. It includes the Government's opposition detailing her flight risk, wealth, and foreign ties (specifically to France and the UK), a victim statement from Annie Farmer, correspondence from the French Ministry of Justice confirming they do not extradite nationals, and Judge Nathan's orders denying bail. The documents highlight Maxwell's offer to renounce her foreign citizenships and pledge significant assets, all of which the Court found insufficient to assure her appearance.
22-1426_Documents.pdf
This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.
EFTA00032797.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 related to the U.S. v. Maxwell case. It discusses a filing by defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and a subsequent endorsement by Judge Nathan regarding the delay of legal mail for Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as GM). The judge expressed a 'firm expectation' that the defendant receive legal mail within one business day.
EFTA00032744.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and government officials (likely BOP/MDC) regarding her conditions of confinement in June 2021. Sternheim alleges that guards are sleep-depriving Maxwell by waking her at 1 AM and 3 AM when she shivers from cold, and subsequently confiscated her blankets. The correspondence also debates the quality of VTC (video) connections for legal preparation and the behavior of guards, which the defense characterizes as hostile and the prosecution characterizes as enforcing orders.
EFTA00032729.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 16, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate behavior by guards, including 'barking orders' and 'officiousness.' The BOP official responds by explaining VTC storage protocols, noting that Maxwell has declined daily medical care offers, and requesting a photo of ear buds Sternheim wishes to bring in.
EFTA00032727.pdf
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (forwarded to USANYS). Sternheim complains about poor VTC quality affecting attorney-client privilege and alleges inappropriate/harassing behavior by guards towards Maxwell. The prison official responds that VTC units are stored for protection, Maxwell must obey orders, and notes that Maxwell consistently declines daily medical care offers.
EFTA00032724.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room impeding attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate and threatening behavior by the guards assigned to Maxwell's detail.
EFTA00032722.pdf
An email chain from June 16, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim lodges a formal complaint regarding conditions affecting her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaints focus on technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and specific allegations of inappropriate, threatening, and mocking behavior by detention guards toward Maxwell.
EFTA00032669.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Haddon, Morgan & Foreman; Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence details disputes and arrangements for reviewing 'highly confidential' materials, including over 2,100 nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, as well as physical evidence stored at an FBI warehouse in the Bronx. Specific items discussed include massage tables, plaster busts of female torsos, a stuffed dog, cash held at Federal Plaza, and various electronic recording media.
EFTA00032465.pdf
This document contains a chain of legal correspondence between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for her trial. The discussions focus on protocols for accessing 'highly confidential' materials, specifically 2,100 nude or partially nude electronic images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices, which the government deems obscene and restricts from duplication. The emails also negotiate the transport of physical evidence, including computers, cash, and bulky items like massage tables and plaster busts, from an FBI warehouse in the Bronx to the courthouse at 500 Pearl Street.
EFTA00032083.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 2, 2021, involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim is formally notifying government officials (likely USANYS) of a breach in attorney-client privilege, stating that during a VTC session the previous day, Maxwell observed suspicious activity on the monitor which was also witnessed by an MDC Case Manager. Sternheim demands an explanation and remediation for this interference with the 'secure' Webex line.
EFTA00031952.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 4, 2020, involving defense attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP and prosecutors from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a draft letter regarding a briefing schedule to be sent to Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The top email indicates approval of the draft ('Fine with me') from one of the recipients.
EFTA00031918.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 16, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in support of her third motion for bail. The defense proposes a comprehensive bail package including a $28.5 million bond, asset monitoring by a retired federal judge, and renunciation of her British and French citizenships to mitigate flight risk concerns. Attached as Exhibit A is a legal opinion from French attorney William Julié arguing that if Maxwell renounces her French citizenship, she would no longer be protected from extradition by France, countering the French Ministry of Justice's position.
EFTA00031916.pdf
This document is an email dated March 16, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the chambers of Judge Nathan (NYSD). Sternheim submits an unredacted Reply Memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's pending bail application under seal, copying other defense attorneys including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00031675.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 7, 2021, originating from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (Reply to Dkt 270) related to the case U.S. v. Maxwell (S2 20 Cr. 330) to prosecutors (redacted) and cc's fellow defense attorneys Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email was subsequently forwarded internally by a redacted sender.
EFTA00031432.pdf
An email chain from April 2021 discussing the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement. Her attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be allowed to access legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she spent over three hours idle there that morning. The forwarding party indicates they have no objection to this request subject to Marshal approval.
EFTA00031205.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2021, regarding the legal case U.S. v. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim sends a courtesy copy of an ECF filing (a response to government voir dire opposition) to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email is then forwarded internally among USANYS staff with an 'FYI'. The document lists co-counsel for the defense including Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca.
EFTA00031202.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2021, among US Attorney's Office (USANYS) staff coordinating a response to a letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim. The emails reveal urgent internal coordination to meet a 5 PM deadline set by Judge Nathan, discussions about reviewing the draft with the MDC/BOP, and strategic decisions regarding how to address specific points raised by the defense, specifically regarding legal mail and the volume of discovery materials.
EFTA00030973.pdf
This document is an email dated February 23, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and copied to defense team members Christian Everdell, Laura Menninger, and Jeff Pagliuca. The email serves to provide a courtesy copy of a 'Maxwell Bail Application' filed that day in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330).
EFTA00030941.pdf
This document is an email thread between defense attorney Christian Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). On December 28, 2020, Everdell requested a Bill of Particulars. On January 10, 2021, the USANYS responded with an attached letter regarding the request in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (indicated by 'GM' in the filename).
EFTA00030934.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.
EFTA00030925.pdf
This document is a footer or signature page from a communication sent by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. It contains contact information, a Covid-19 notice stating the office is working remotely, and a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer. No specific case details or recipients are visible on this page.
EFTA00030880.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.
EFTA00030021.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office regarding the logistics of reviewing evidence for the case *US v. Maxwell*. The discussion focuses on the protocols for reviewing 'Highly Confidential' materials (specifically nude images and videos seized from Jeffrey Epstein's devices), the transport of physical evidence (including massage tables, plaster busts, and a stuffed dog) from the FBI Bronx warehouse to the courthouse, and the scheduling of Maxwell's transport by Marshals to 500 Pearl Street. The prosecution refuses to transport bulky items or obscene digital material freely, requiring the defense to view some items at the warehouse or on specific laptops under supervision.
EFTA00030015.pdf
Defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim writes to Judge Alison Nathan objecting to a second superseding indictment filed against Ghislaine Maxwell just months before the scheduled July 2021 trial. The defense argues this expansion of charges (covering 1994-2004) constitutes tactical gamesmanship and abuse of power, potentially necessitating a delay in the trial. The letter also requests an in-person arraignment and a new bail hearing, citing issues with remote proceedings and referencing Maxwell's difficult detention conditions.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Unknown
Standard legal disclaimer and Covid-19 office closure notice found in an email signature/footer.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Maurene Comey (maurene.comey@usdoj.gov) and Andrew Rohrbach (andrew.rohrbach@usdoj.gov).
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via U.S. mail (postage prepaid) to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Foregoing motion with exhibit
Bobbi C. Sternheim served a legal motion via email to Hon. John M. Leventhal (judgeleventhal@aidalalaw.com).
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter opposing the motion filed by counsel for Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to give oral victim impact statements at Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing hearing. The letter argues that neither individual qualifies as a statutory crime victim under the CVRA.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim informs Judge Nathan that her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been unjustifiably placed on suicide watch by the MDC, preventing her from preparing for her sentencing. Sternheim states Maxwell is not suicidal and warns that she will move for an adjournment if the situation persists.
No Subject
This is the signature page of a letter or legal filing from Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicating that attachments are included and that Counsel of Record have been copied.
Challenge to standing under CVRA
No preview available
Sentencing Procedures / Victim Statements
Request regarding the manner of sentencing and opposition to impact statements from individuals not identified as victims in the charged offenses.
Defense counsel letter regarding sealing of certain docum...
No preview available
Defense counsel writes regarding sealing of certain docum...
Letter dated 6/17/2022 entered on 6/21/2022.
2-day extension to file sentencing submission
Request for extension (Denied by court on 05/11/2022).
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request for a two-day extension to file sentencing submission due to attorney travel.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Requesting a stay of ruling pending review of a new interview given by Juror 50 to Paramount Plus.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter arguing for a new trial for Ghislaine Maxwell based on the assertion that Juror 50 gave false answers on a juror questionnaire regarding his own past sexual abuse, which should have disqualified him from the jury.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel requesting a proffer from Juror 50's counsel to explain the basis for the juror's assertion of the Fifth Amendment, in light of the juror's public statements and the government's consideration of immunity.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request regarding Juror 50's assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege and government immunity.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order, in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610) from the same day.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter from the defense proposing limited redactions to an attached Opinion and Order in response to a Court Order (Dkt. 610).
Response to Dkt. 605
Letter in response to Order 605.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Discussion regarding proposed redactions to documents related to Juror 50's conduct and motion for a new trial.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
A letter submitting documents under seal with proposed redactions concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The redactions are intended to protect the integrity of an inquiry into the conduct of Juror 50 during the voir dire process.
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in Response to Dkt. 596
Response to Dkt. 596
Letter in response to a previous docket entry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity