DOJ-OGR-00017598.jpg

593 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 593 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey are discussing legal obligations under Rule 16 regarding the disclosure of impeachment evidence (specifically photographs) prior to cross-examination. The text mentions a witness who testified about the appearance of a home and notes that this witness worked for Jeffrey Epstein until 2019.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Discussing witness testimony and foundation of evidence.
Ms. Comey Attorney (Government/Prosecution)
Arguing that the exhibit falls under Rule 16 discovery obligations.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding Rule 16 and impeachment evidence.
Mr. Epstein Subject of interest
Mentioned as the employer of a witness who worked for him until 2019.
Unnamed Witness Witness
Testified regarding the appearance of a home; worked for Epstein until 2019.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting firm listed in footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by document stamp DOJ-OGR-00017598).
The Government
Referenced by the Court regarding production of documents.
The Defense
Referenced by the Court regarding obligations under Rule 16.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Legal argument regarding Rule 16 obligations and impeachment evidence during trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Subject of a photograph/exhibit discussed in testimony.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Witness Employment Mr. Epstein
Ms. Menninger states: 'A witness who continued to work for Mr. Epstein up until 2019.'

Key Quotes (3)

"A witness who continued to work for Mr. Epstein up until 2019."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017598.jpg
Quote #1
"In any event, you'll brief whether the defense is obligated under Rule 16 to produce in advance to the government documents that clearly -- and we're not talking about statements."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017598.jpg
Quote #2
"Whether you're obligated under Rule 16 to turn that over in advance,"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017598.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document