DOJ-OGR-00008521.jpg

404 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing (jury instructions)
File Size: 404 KB
Summary

This document is page 65 of a court filing (Document 562) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which directs the jury on how to weigh testimony provided by law enforcement officials and government employees, specifically noting that such testimony should not automatically receive greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Law enforcement officials Witnesses
Generic reference to category of witnesses providing testimony.
Government employees Witnesses
Generic reference to category of witnesses providing testimony.
Defense counsel Legal Counsel
Mentioned as having the right to attack the credibility of government witnesses.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Federal Government
Employer of law enforcement and employee witnesses.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR').

Relationships (1)

Defense Counsel Adversarial/Legal Law Enforcement Witnesses
Instruction states defense counsel is allowed to try to attack the credibility of such a witness.

Key Quotes (3)

"Instruction No. 46: Law Enforcement and Government Employee Witnesses"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008521.jpg
Quote #1
"The fact that a witness may be employed by the Federal Government as a law enforcement official or employee does not mean that his or her testimony is necessarily deserving of more or less consideration or greater or lesser weight than that of an ordinary witness."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008521.jpg
Quote #2
"In this context, defense counsel is allowed to try to attack the credibility of such a witness on the ground that his or her testimony may be colored by a personal or professional interest in the outcome of the case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00008521.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document