Federal government
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
State and local authorities
|
Jurisdictional division |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
United States attorney
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
private sector employee
|
Comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Governments
|
Fiscal funding |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Party to agreement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Federal lawsuit filed against the government by victims | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit against Federal Government | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement finalized, including protection for four of Mr. Epstein'... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entry into Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Indictment and charges | Mr. Epstein was indicted for solicitation, and the state of Florida was urged to bring a second c... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | A 'global solution' agreement was reached involving a plea in state court for soliciting an under... | state court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the federal government for se... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution deal with the federal government. | Florida | View |
| 2018-12-22 | Government shutdown | The federal government was closed from December 22, 2018, to January 25, 2019. | N/A | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Federal government conceded it gave Epstein 'valuable consideration' for information. | Unknown | View |
| 2011-06-01 | N/A | Expected expiration of Federal Support for Medicaid | USA | View |
| 2010-10-01 | N/A | Start of Fiscal Year 2011 example | USA | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | ARRA (economic stimulus) provided ~$100 billion in support for states | USA | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Two victims sued the federal government under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac taken into federal conservatorship | USA | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Final Plea Bargain / Sentencing | Federal/State Court | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Mr. Epstein's legal team negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with the federal government. | N/A | View |
| 1970-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). | United States | View |
| 1942-01-01 | N/A | Farmers planted 36,000 acres of hemp to aid the war effort. | USA | View |
| 0001-10-01 | N/A | Scheduled launch of the health insurance exchange systems. | USA | View |
EFTA00024358.pdf
This document is an internal email chain within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 8, 2019. It circulates a media inquiry from Insider reporter Keenan Trotter regarding Jeffrey Epstein's potential ties to foreign governments, specifically mentioning an expired Austrian passport and travels to the Middle East. A USANYS official responds to the forwarded chain stating, 'Thanks, I'll handle it.'
DOJ-OGR-00008521.jpg
This document is page 65 of a court filing (Document 562) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 17, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which directs the jury on how to weigh testimony provided by law enforcement officials and government employees, specifically noting that such testimony should not automatically receive greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00008298.jpg
This document is page 325 of a confidential deposition transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell describes the logistics of scheduling massages for 'him' (implied Epstein) based on availability. The interrogator asks if Maxwell would be surprised to learn that the Federal Government found girls on the 'massage Florida' list were under the age of 18, to which Maxwell responds that she has no knowledge of the government's findings.
DOJ-OGR-00000418.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 16, 2019, where a lawyer is speaking on behalf of their client, Mr. Epstein. The lawyer describes a past comprehensive legal agreement that included a plea, victim compensation, and a non-prosecution agreement from the federal government. The lawyer argues that since 2008, Mr. Epstein has led a law-abiding life under constant monitoring and that the current court case arises from litigation under the Crime Victims Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00015263.jpg
This document is page 16 of a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (represented by executors Indyke and Kahn), dated June 3, 2020. The text alleges that Jeffrey Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, and claims these photos are currently held by the federal government. It is signed by attorney Robert S. Glassman of Panish Shea & Boyle LLP.
DOJ-OGR-00015260.jpg
This document is a Plaintiff's response to interrogatories in litigation against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. It itemizes evidence establishing the relationship between Jane Doe and Epstein, including flight logs, phone records from Darren Indyke, and financial records covering rent, tuition, acting classes, and intimate items like underwear. It also alleges that Epstein took photographs of the Plaintiff as a minor without her knowledge, which are currently held by the federal government.
DOJ-OGR-00022008.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated February 10, 2020. In it, a defense attorney argues for an adjournment, stating that their small law firm requires more than 90 days to prepare a defense, which involves reviewing at least 25 witness statements and tracking down witnesses. The attorney contrasts their limited resources with the extensive time and resources the federal government used to investigate and bring an indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
This document details the findings of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation by Acosta and the USAO. While the report concludes that Acosta did not commit professional misconduct, it determines that his decision to use a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) constituted poor judgment due to flawed applications of federalism and insufficient oversight. Additionally, the document addresses interactions with victims, concluding that attorneys did not violate the CVRA as interpreted at the time, though the lack of consultation is noted.
DOJ-OGR-00004828.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 07/02/21) discussing the legal history of the Bill Cosby case, likely cited as precedent in the Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein proceedings regarding non-prosecution agreements. It details Cosby's admission to using Quaaludes for sex, his $3.38 million settlement with Andrea Constand, and the reopening of the criminal investigation by D.A. Risa Vetri Ferman after civil records were unsealed in 2015. It also notes a $20,000 payment to Constand from American Media, Inc.
DOJ-OGR-00014638.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 767, filed 08/10/22, Page 238 of 257) containing a legal instruction (Instruction No. 46) titled 'Law Enforcement and Government Employee Witnesses.' It outlines how a jury should evaluate inconsistencies in a witness's testimony and the credibility of law enforcement or government employee witnesses, noting that their testimony is not inherently more credible than an ordinary witness and can be challenged by defense counsel based on potential personal or professional interests.
DOJ-OGR-00008772.jpg
This document is a jury instruction, specifically Instruction No. 46, from a legal case filed on December 19, 2021. It advises the jury on how to evaluate the testimony of witnesses who are law enforcement officials or employees of the Federal Government. The instruction clarifies that such testimony should not be given more or less weight simply due to the witness's employment and notes that the defense may challenge their credibility based on potential bias or interest in the case's outcome.
DOJ-OGR-00008686.jpg
This document is Page 148 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 46, which guides the jury on how to evaluate testimony provided by law enforcement and government employees, specifically noting that their employment status does not automatically grant their testimony greater weight than that of ordinary witnesses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.jpg
An email from Steven Hoffenberg dated August 11, 2016, addressed internally to Roger Stone. Hoffenberg claims to be collaborating on a James Patterson book exposing a federal cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, scheduled for release in October 2016. The email also references Hoffenberg's involvement with a Trump Super PAC and claims regarding the ownership of New York Post operations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022128.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 230-231), labeled as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. It details the period following Jeffrey Epstein's release from jail around July 2010, highlighting his lawyer Jack Goldberger's denial of further investigations and Epstein's pivot to rebranding himself as a science philanthropist via the website JeffreyEpsteinScience.com. The text contrasts Epstein's self-promotion with a quote from associate Stuart Pivar, who claims Epstein knew nothing about science but was vital for funding scientists, and mentions a conference called 'Mindshift' hosted on his private island attended by figures like Murray Gell-Mann.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022038.jpg
This document contains pages 230 and 231 from the book 'Filthy Rich', stamped as House Oversight evidence. It details Jeffrey Epstein's attempts to rehabilitate his image post-incarceration through a science website and conferences ('Mindshift') at 'Little Saint Jeff's.' It contrasts his lawyer Jack Goldberger's assertion that legal troubles were over with art collector Stuart Pivar's candid dismissal of Epstein's scientific knowledge, noting that scientists only associated with him for funding.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020967.jpg
This document consists of two slides (pages 251 and 252) from a presentation titled 'USA Inc. | What Might a Turnaround Expert Consider?' produced by KPCB. The content analyzes US government entitlement programs (Medicare, Social Security, Medicaid) as business liabilities, arguing they are not legal contracts and can be modified by Congress. It proposes a turnaround strategy focusing on expense reduction (reforming entitlements) and revenue generation (economic growth and tax policy).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020891.jpg
This document consists of two slides from a KPCB presentation (likely the 'USA Inc.' report) analyzing US government finances around 2010-2011. It details the strain of Medicaid on state budgets, the temporary relief provided by ARRA stimulus, and lists net losses/profits for major government programs like Medicare, Social Security, and TARP. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation, though no specific connection to Epstein is visible in the text of these specific slides.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026793.jpg
A 2018 letter from attorney Alan Fraade (representing Steven Hoffenberg) to Epstein's lawyer, Darren Indyke, proposing a 'mutually beneficial agreement.' The letter claims Hoffenberg can help Epstein avoid jail time through connections, specifically mentioning that Governor Ben Barnes is prepared to meet President Trump and Gary Baise will meet the DOJ. The letter threatens that a draft Complaint will be filed against Epstein if he does not engage in these discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017966.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It features an interview with Courtney Wild (Jane Doe No. 1), a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who discusses being misled by prosecutors regarding Epstein's plea deal and her subsequent lawsuit against the federal government for violating the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text also references Alexander Acosta's role as the prosecutor who oversaw the lenient non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017803.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing a printed Miami Herald article from April 2019. It focuses on Courtney Wild (Jane Doe No. 1), a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who is suing the federal government for violating the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping victims uninformed about Epstein's plea deal. The article implicates Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, noting that prosecutors under his authority gave Epstein a lenient deal, despite Acosta's claims to lawmakers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010600.jpg
This document page details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein violated judicial no-contact orders by hiring a private investigator to harass and intimidate a witness ('Jane Doe') prior to a scheduled civil trial in July 2010. It describes a specific incident where an investigator stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to be moved to a secure location by a retired police officer. It also notes that attorney Edwards filed civil cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe regarding sexual abuse of children.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010582.jpg
This document, page 17 of a legal filing marked with House Oversight bates stamps, details the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It outlines his guilty plea to state charges in Palm Beach County on June 30, 2008, and the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government that shielded him from federal charges while acknowledging potential compensation for approximately 34 victims. The text also references an attorney named Edwards filing a motion regarding a CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) action and a victim (Jane Doe) appearing on television to criticize the leniency of the plea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010532.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' (pages 190-191), marked as House Oversight evidence. It details the legal aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 guilty plea and the secret non-prosecution agreement signed in September 2007. The text focuses on attorney Bradley Edwards' pro bono lawsuit filed in July 2008, which argued that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by concealing the agreement from victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015593.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing by Alan Dershowitz, arguing that Virginia Roberts Giuffre made false statements in an affidavit regarding former President Bill Clinton's presence on Little St. James Island. The filing cites a determination by former FBI Director Louis Freeh that FOIA records suggest Clinton was not on the island during the alleged time. It also references exhibits including a Daily Mail article and a transcript of a call between Dershowitz and a woman named Rebecca.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013463.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It details Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), his repeated invocation of the 5th Amendment during depositions to avoid self-incrimination regarding sex crimes against minors, and the depositions of his co-conspirators who were employed to procure underage girls. The document highlights that Jane Doe refused to limit her damages to $150,000 as stipulated in the NPA and asserts that Epstein's co-conspirators helped protect him from law enforcement detection.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity