DOJ-OGR-00001523.jpg
602 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court order
File Size:
602 KB
Summary
This page is from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated July 6, 2020. It argues for a 'partial closure' of the courtroom proceedings due to the health risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, citing specific infection statistics for New Hampshire and the United States. The document references the legal precedent *United States v. Smith* to justify security measures and closures in the interest of public safety.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | Defendant in cited case |
Cited in legal precedent United States v. Smith regarding partial courtroom closure.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. |
Cited as source for COVID-19 statistics.
|
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio |
Cited as source for COVID-19 data tracking.
|
|
| Real Clear Politics |
Cited as source for national COVID-19 statistics.
|
|
| U.S. Marshal |
Mentioned in the case citation regarding security policies after September 11th.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court of Appeals (2d Cir.) |
Court that issued the opinion in United States v. Smith (2005).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where COVID-19 statistics are being cited.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"COVID-19 presents an enormous danger to the health and safety of the public, including the litigants, security, and court personnel involved in this proceeding."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001523.jpg
Quote #1
"The court’s interest in preventing the spread of COVID-19... is a weighty and substantial interest that would likely be prejudiced if the court were not to impose this partial closure."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001523.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document