DOJ-OGR-00005836.jpg
673 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court order page
File Size:
673 KB
Summary
This document page discusses legal arguments regarding the admissibility of testimony from "Minor Victim-3" in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and a defendant. The text argues against the defense's claim that such testimony would be unfairly prejudicial or cause confusion regarding United Kingdom law, asserting that jury instructions will be sufficient.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-3 | ||
| Epstein | ||
| Minor Victim-1 | ||
| Minor Victim-2 | ||
| the defendant |
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | ||
| Government |
Timeline (3 events)
Trial
Indictment
Pretrial motion
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"The defense argues that this testimony will be unfairly prejudicial to the defendant."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005836.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court should not assume that the jury will speculate about principles of United Kingdom law and apply them to this case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005836.jpg
Quote #2
"The risk of unfair prejudice is therefore minimal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005836.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document