Minor Victim-1
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Casey
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness-1
|
Witness victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness-2
|
Witness victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Alleged interaction |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Investigator witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Groomer abuser and victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser and victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Casey
|
Agent |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Witness for prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
|
Non existent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator and victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser and victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Trip | Epstein and MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-1 to travel to Epstein's residences. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Meeting/interaction | Request to identify dates and locations of alleged meeting/interaction between Ms. Maxwell and Mi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and sexual abuse | JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited multiple minor victims (Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, Min... | Manhattan, New York; Palm B... | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government's case against Ms. Maxwell, which is alleged to be based entirely on the testimony... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | Minor Victim-1 was sexually abused by Epstein. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Crime | Multiple group sexual encounters involving Minor Victim-1, who was under the age of 18. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Meeting | Ghislaine Maxwell met Minor Victim-1 when Minor Victim-1 was approximately 14 years old. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | EPSTEIN encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-1 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | Minor Victim-1 was sexually abused by Epstein in both New York and Florida. | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Crime | Epstein abusing Minor Victim-1 and Minor Victim-2. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | Alleged instances of sexual abuse took place over a three-year period beginning approximately 27 ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Crime | Minor Victim-1 was enticed to travel from Florida to New York for purposes of sexually abusing her. | From Florida to New York | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where the Government is requesting special measures for how minor victims and witnesses a... | court | View |
| N/A | Interaction | MAXWELL subsequently interacted with Minor Victim-1 on multiple occasions at Epstein’s residences. | Epstein’s residences | View |
| N/A | Trip | Ghislaine Maxwell arranged for Minor Victim-1 to be transported from Florida to New York on multi... | From Florida to New York, N... | View |
| N/A | Trip | Transportation of Minor Victim-1 from Florida to New York on multiple occasions for the purpose o... | Between Florida and New York | View |
| N/A | Grooming | Ghislaine Maxwell groomed Minor Victim-1 to engage in sexual acts with Epstein. This included bef... | Epstein's residences | View |
| N/A | Trip | Transportation of Minor Victim-1 from Florida to New York for the purpose of engaging in sex acts... | Florida to New York, New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding / testimony | Victims are expected to testify about sexual abuse. The Government has requested that Minor Victi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and sexual abuse | Minor Victim-1 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abuse... | New York Residence | View |
| N/A | Crime | Allegation that individuals under 18, including Minor Victim-1, were caused to engage in a commer... | Manhattan, New York | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The government's case against Ms. Maxwell, which the document argues is based entirely on the tes... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse | MAXWELL involved Minor Victim-1 in group sexualized massages of Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | Epstein and MAXWELL encouraged Minor Victim-1 to travel to Epstein's residences in New York and F... | New York and Florida | View |
| N/A | Grooming | Request to identify dates and locations where Ms. Maxwell allegedly groomed Minor Victim-1 to eng... | N/A | View |
001-02.pdf
This document is the 2019 Sealed Indictment (19 Cr. 490) against Jeffrey Epstein filed in the SDNY, charging him with Sex Trafficking Conspiracy and Sex Trafficking. It details allegations that between 2002 and 2005, Epstein created a network of underage victims in New York and Florida, paying them for sexual acts disguised as massages and incentivizing them to recruit other minors. The indictment lists specific overt acts involving three minor victims and three employees who facilitated the abuse by scheduling appointments, and it seeks forfeiture of Epstein's property at 9 East 71st Street, owned by Maple, Inc.
013.pdf
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
022-01.pdf
This document is an indictment (19 Cr. 490) filed in the SDNY charging Jeffrey Epstein with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of minors between 2002 and 2005. It details how Epstein used a network of employees and victim-recruiters to source minors for sexual abuse at his residences in New York and Palm Beach, paying them in cash. The document also includes forfeiture allegations for his property at 9 East 71st Street, New York, owned by Maple, Inc.
014.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP on behalf of Plaintiff Maria Farmer in the case 'Farmer v. Indyke et al.' It argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Farmer's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) because they were filed within one year of the termination of the criminal action against Jeffrey Epstein (Aug 29, 2019). The letter also argues that equitable estoppel applies due to threats made against Farmer, including a specific death threat involving the West Side Highway.
025.pdf
A legal letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Lorna G. Schofield arguing against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al. The letter argues that the Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York Law (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It also asserts that punitive damages should be addressed after discovery.
013.pdf
This document is a letter from plaintiff's counsel (Boies Schiller Flexner) to Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr. in the case *Bryant v. Indyke et al.*, dated January 29, 2020. The letter argues against the defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Juliette Bryant's claims are timely under New York statutes (CPLR § 215(8)(a) and § 213-c) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel due to Epstein's intimidation tactics. It details that Bryant was a resident of New York during the abuse (2002-2005 era) and was raped repeatedly by Epstein at his New York home.
EFTA00030934.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated December 28, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The letter formally requests a Bill of Particulars to clarify the allegations in the Superseding Indictment, specifically asking for the real names of Minor Victims 1-3, precise dates and locations of alleged grooming and sexual abuse, details regarding travel in 1996 (NM and FL/NY), and specifics concerning perjury allegations from 2016 depositions.
EFTA00030569.pdf
This document is a formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding 22 specific discovery requests made on October 13, 2020. The government addresses requests for Epstein's diary, the 'Billionaires Playboy Club' manuscript, flight logs (implied in broader requests but not itemized), and the identities of minor victims, often denying immediate production based on Rule 16 restrictions or asserting that materials have already been produced. The letter also discusses the handling of potential 'Brady' and 'Giglio' materials, stating that impeachment evidence will be produced closer to trial.
EFTA00025148.pdf
This document is a federal indictment filed on July 16, 2018, in the Southern District of New York against Claudius English (aka 'Jay Barnes', 'Brent English'). English is charged with ten counts including conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking of minors, specific acts of sex trafficking and attempted sex trafficking involving seven minor victims (ages 8 to 17), kidnapping, and firearms offenses occurring in 2013. The indictment details how English recruited victims from New Jersey, transported them to the Bronx, photographed them for internet advertisements, and coerced them into commercial sex acts.
EFTA00024238.pdf
This document is a Government Exhibit Index from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 28, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, contact books), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Island), flight logs, financial records, and emails. The index organizes these exhibits by series numbers, providing descriptions, Bates ranges, and production dates for each item.
EFTA00023049.pdf
This document is a 'List of Particulars' (Exhibit A), likely filed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains 29 specific requests demanding the government provide precise dates, locations, and details regarding allegations of sexual abuse, grooming, and interstate travel involving three minor victims between 1994 and 1997. It also requests specifics regarding perjury allegations related to depositions in 2016.
EFTA00021038.pdf
This document is an 11-page Government Exhibit Index from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial, dated November 23, 2021. It lists hundreds of exhibits including physical evidence (massage tables, hard drives), photographs of victims and properties (Palm Beach, NY, Zorro Ranch, Little St. James), financial records (JPMC), and school records. Notably, the index lists two flight logbooks (GX-661 and GX-662) covering 1991 to 2013, though the specific flight details are not contained within this index document itself.
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00010105.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 18, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests a ruling that the birth certificates of Minor Victims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 be deemed self-authenticating under Federal Rules of Evidence 902 and 902(4), thereby avoiding the need to call records custodians from various states (RI, MO, NY, CA, MA) to testify at trial. The defense had refused to stipulate to the authenticity of these records despite having no reason to doubt them.
DOJ-OGR-00001577.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on or about April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of a scheme by Jeffrey Epstein to recruit underage girls. The indictment presents this as false testimony, referencing Maxwell's alleged role in transporting a minor from Florida to New York for sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001575.jpg
This is page 13 of a federal indictment (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on July 8, 2020, charging Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Count 16 regarding the conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity and lists 'Overt Acts' including Maxwell's participation in group sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and 'Minor Victim-1' between 1994 and 1997 in New York and Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00001570.jpg
This legal document alleges that MAXWELL actively participated with Epstein in the sexual abuse of minors. It details how MAXWELL allegedly involved 'Minor Victim-1' in sexualized massages and encouraged her to travel to Epstein's properties in New York and Florida, and how she groomed 'Minor Victim-2' in New Mexico around 1996 for abuse by Epstein, knowing the victim was underage.
DOJ-OGR-00001516.jpg
This document is page 15 of a federal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell (filed July 2, 2020). It outlines 'Count Five' (Perjury), charging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition for a civil case (15 Civ. 7344) when she denied knowing about Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages. It also references the transport of 'Minor Victim-1' from Florida to New York for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00001514.jpg
This document is page 13 of a court filing (indictment) from July 6, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details Count 16 (Conspiracy) and lists 'Overt Acts,' specifically alleging that between 1994 and 1997, Maxwell and Epstein engaged in group sexual encounters with 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida, and that in 1996, the victim was enticed to travel across state lines for sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00001512.jpg
This document is a page from a legal indictment detailing allegations against Maxwell involving the abuse of three minor victims between 1994 and 1997 in locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. It lists specific acts such as group sexual encounters and unsolicited massages, and introduces 'Count Two' regarding the enticement of a minor to travel for illegal sex acts.
DOJ-OGR-00001481.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2020. It outlines Count Five (Perjury), alleging that on April 22, 2016, Maxwell lied under oath during a deposition by denying knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's scheme to recruit underage girls. The indictment references Maxwell's alleged role in transporting "Minor Victim-1" from Florida to New York for Epstein as context for the charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001479.jpg
This legal document, page 13 of a court filing, outlines overt acts in a conspiracy case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein conspired to transport a minor for sexual activity, detailing specific acts such as group sexual encounters with 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida between 1994-1997 and enticing the same victim to travel from Florida to New York for abuse in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00001478.jpg
This document is page 12 of a criminal indictment filed on June 29, 2020, against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details charges related to the period between 1994 and 1997, specifically alleging that Maxwell coerced 'Minor Victim-1' to travel from Florida to New York to engage in sexual acts with Jeffrey Epstein. It also introduces 'Count Three,' charging Maxwell, Epstein, and others with conspiracy to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00001474.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, alleges Ghislaine Maxwell's direct involvement in the sexual abuse and trafficking of two minors alongside Jeffrey Epstein. It claims Maxwell facilitated the abuse of "Minor Victim-1" by involving her in sexualized massages and encouraging her travel to Epstein's residences in New York and Florida. The document also details Maxwell's alleged grooming of "Minor Victim-2" in New Mexico around 1996, stating Maxwell knew the victim was underage and actively prepared her for abuse by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001192.jpg
This page from a defense filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues that the government's case against Ghislaine Maxwell relies entirely on the uncorroborated testimony of three accusers, specifically noting that Counts Two and Four rely solely on 'Minor Victim-1'. The defense asserts that the government only began issuing subpoenas regarding Maxwell after Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting the case was assembled 'after the fact'. A large block of text regarding specific government evidence is redacted.
Scheduling appointment
Scheduling appointment for Minor Victim-1 to engage in paid sex acts with Epstein.
No Subject
Scheduling appointment for sex acts with Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity