HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013728.jpg
1.99 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Scientific/academic paper or book page (part of house oversight production)
File Size:
1.99 MB
Summary
This document is page 228 of a scientific text (likely a book or academic paper) bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013728. The text discusses mathematical concepts of 'capacity dimension' (D₀) and fractal geometry applied to clinical neuroscience, specifically regarding data collection from spinal fluid and catheters. It critiques arbitrary mathematical criteria when applied to empirical biological data.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Farmer | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1983)
|
| Grassberger | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1983)
|
| Procaccia | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1983)
|
| Meyer-Kress | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1986)
|
| Theiler, J. | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1990)
|
| Gershenfeld | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1992)
|
| Ott | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to geometric scaling exponents (1994)
|
| Broomhead | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to differential equations data representation (1986)
|
| King | Cited Researcher |
Cited in reference to differential equations data representation (1986)
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
Relationships (2)
Cited together 'Grassberger and Procaccia, 1983'
Key Quotes (3)
"Assuming robust findings using D₀ as indicated by non-parametric tests of significance in test-retest, before and after, drug treatment designs, this arbitrary criteria sounds more like ritual than meaningful help for the clinical neuroscientist..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013728.jpg
Quote #1
"In the context of real data... we are dealing with empirical findings that must find their meaning (or lack of) in the context of questions about issues in the neurosciences..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013728.jpg
Quote #2
"In a similar arbitrary spirit, a system manifesting a D₀ > 5 is considered not discriminable from a random process"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013728.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document