Farmer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
A. Farmer's sister
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed male
|
Communicants |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Subject of testimony witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subject of testimony witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Los Alamos
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Farmer's attorneys
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Adversarial accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Indyke
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | Witness Farmer met with law enforcement. | New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip to New Mexico taken by the witness, Farmer, which is the subject of questioning. | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Alleged sexual abuse | An incident described as "hand-holding" which was reported to a victims compensation fund. | movie theater in New Mexico | View |
| N/A | Alleged sexual abuse | An incident described as "him holding and caressing my hands" which was reported to a victims com... | movie theater in New York | View |
| N/A | Life event | The witness, A. Farmer, describes their family's financial situation when they were 16 years old,... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A visit to Mr. Epstein's house where he discussed college applications with the witness. | Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | Gift | Mr. Epstein surprised the witness with tickets to the Phantom of the Opera. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Tour | Epstein and Maxwell gave Farmer a tour of the ranch. | the ranch | View |
| N/A | Shopping trip | Farmer went shopping in town with Epstein and Maxwell. During the trip, Ghislaine bought Farmer a... | town | View |
| N/A | Incident | An unspecified negative event that happened to the witness in a movie theater. | New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip to the movies after leaving the ranch. | A movie theater in a mall area | View |
| N/A | Trip | A trip to New Mexico taken by Farmer. The questioning reveals there is no documentation about whe... | New Mexico | View |
| 2025-04-01 | Social event | A prom that the witness discussed with friends. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Redirect examination of witness A. Farmer in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Farmer regarding a trip to New Mexico. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Kate as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Detention hearing | A detention hearing was held for Ms. Maxwell, after which Mr. Boies commented on the proceedings. | court | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Hearing | A detention hearing for Ms. Maxwell was held. | Court (virtual/remote parti... | View |
| 2020-03-05 | N/A | Transcript of Premotion Conference, Farmer v. Indyke, et al., No. 19-cv-10475 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y.) | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Application | Witness Farmer, with her attorneys, applied to the victim compensation fund for victims of Jeffre... | N/A | View |
| 2019-01-01 | Legal action | Witness Farmer filed a lawsuit against an unspecified party. | N/A | View |
| 1998-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Farmer, 137 F.3d 1265 (10th Cir. 1998) | 10th Cir. | View |
055.pdf
Scheduling Order issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, coordinating deadlines for multiple civil lawsuits against the Epstein Estate (Indyke et al.) and Nine East 71st Street. The order establishes deadlines for initial disclosures, document requests, fact discovery (June 10, 2020), and expert discovery (July 31, 2020), and notes ongoing settlement discussions with a status report due by April 30, 2020. The document lists 13 separate civil actions being managed together under this order.
053.pdf
Court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 14, 2020, coordinating pretrial supervision for multiple civil lawsuits filed by women alleging sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Debra Freeman orders the parties to submit a discovery schedule by February 6, 2020, and schedules a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020. The document lists thirteen specific cases involving plaintiffs such as Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe, and others against Indyke and other Epstein-related entities.
016.pdf
This document is a Scheduling Order from the US District Court (SDNY) dated February 11, 2020, issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. It consolidates deadlines for discovery, expert reports, and status updates for thirteen related civil cases involving plaintiffs suing the Epstein estate executors (Indyke) and related entities. The order sets a fact discovery deadline of June 10, 2020, and mentions ongoing settlement discussions.
011.pdf
This document is a court order filed on January 14, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the Southern District of New York. It coordinates the discovery schedules for multiple civil cases filed against the Jeffrey Epstein estate (represented by Indyke et al.) by various plaintiffs claiming sexual abuse. The order mandates the submission of discovery plans by February 6, 2020, and sets a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020.
015.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (executors of the Epstein estate) and 'Nine East 71st Street et al.' The proceedings are stayed to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, with status reports required starting October 1, 2020.
038.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York, dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order applies to multiple civil cases against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al., staying proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are ordered to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
046.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The document lists numerous civil cases filed against 'Indyke et al.' (Epstein's estate executors) by various victims (Does, Farmer, Helm, etc.). The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
070.pdf
A court order dated September 4, 2020, by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman of the Southern District of New York. The order directs the docketing of stays in multiple lawsuits against Indyke et al. and Nine East 71st Street et al. to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Parties are required to submit status reports starting October 1, 2020.
027.pdf
Scheduling Order issued by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on February 11, 2020, for multiple consolidated cases against the Epstein estate (Indyke et al.). The order sets deadlines for initial disclosures, discovery requests, motions to amend, fact discovery completion (June 10, 2020), and expert reports.
021.pdf
This document is a Scheduling Order issued on February 11, 2020, by U.S. Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman in the Southern District of New York. It consolidates deadlines for discovery, expert reports, and settlement discussions across thirteen related civil cases involving plaintiffs (many anonymous Does) suing 'Indyke et al.' (referring to the Epstein estate executors) and 'Nine East 71st Street'. The order establishes a timeline for fact discovery to conclude by June 2020 and expert discovery by July 2020.
051.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated September 4, 2020, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order lists numerous civil cases brought by victims (many under pseudonyms like Jane Doe, Katlyn Doe, Priscilla Doe) against Indyke (Epstein's estate executor) and other entities. The order acknowledges a stay in proceedings to allow plaintiffs to pursue settlements through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and mandates monthly status reports starting October 1, 2020.
011.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated January 14, 2020 (misdated 2019 in signature), by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman. The order addresses thirteen separate civil cases brought by alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein against his estate and associates (Indyke et al.). The judge sets deadlines for proposed discovery schedules (Feb 6, 2020) and schedules a joint pretrial conference for February 11, 2020, to coordinate supervision despite the cases not being formally consolidated.
EFTA00038923.pdf
An email dated October 5, 2021, with the subject 'Farmer 3500'. The sender requests '1As' (likely FD-1A evidence attachments) referenced in an attached '302' (FBI interview summary form). The attachment is dated 2021-09-17. The participants are redacted, but the terminology suggests a legal or investigative context involving the FBI and potential witness statements (implied by '3500').
EFTA00013457.pdf
An email dated May 20, 2020, with redacted sender and recipients. The subject refers to an updated draft for a 1:00 call. The email contains an attachment titled '2020-05-19,_perjury_and_Farmer_supplement.docx', likely referencing legal documents concerning Maria Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00001639.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, discusses the case of Ms. Maxwell, focusing on the aftermath of her July 14 detention hearing. It details comments made by David Boies, counsel for an accuser named Farmer, who heavily criticizes Maxwell's 'blame the victim' defense strategy as a 'dangerous tactic'. Boies recounts Farmer's testimony and another story about a 16-year-old named Annie being fraudulently lured by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein to a ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00016333.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning focuses on establishing a timeline of events in April by referencing the release date of the movie "Primal Fear" (April 3rd) and the date of a prom (late April). The witness confirms communicating this information in writing to an unnamed male.
DOJ-OGR-00016288.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a witness named Farmer is under direct examination. Farmer testifies about filing a lawsuit in the fall of 2019, and subsequently applying to a victim compensation fund for victims of Jeffrey Epstein in early 2020. She confirms receiving a $1.5 million award from the fund, which came from the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, and states her attorneys worked pro bono.
DOJ-OGR-00016268.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness named Farmer. She recounts a weekend during which Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell took her on a shopping trip into town from their ranch. During the trip, Ghislaine bought her a hair product, and Epstein purchased a pair of cowboy boots for her, with Maxwell also present.
DOJ-OGR-00019494.jpg
This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, details arguments following Ghislaine Maxwell's detention hearing. It heavily features comments from David Boies, a lawyer for an accuser named Farmer, who criticizes Maxwell's potential 'blame the victim' defense strategy as counterproductive. Boies recounts his client's allegations, including a story about how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly lured a 16-year-old girl named Annie to a ranch in New Mexico with fraudulent promises.
DOJ-OGR-00016381.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning centers on an application Farmer made to a victims compensation fund, in which they claimed to have been sexually abused in movie theaters in New York and New Mexico. Farmer clarifies that the incidents involved hand-holding and caressing, and the questioner probes the discrepancy between this description and the claim of sexual abuse on the application form.
DOJ-OGR-00013703.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New Mexico, establishing that there is no journal, document, or any other form of record to confirm the details of the trip, including its date, purpose, participants, or what occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00013702.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning establishes that the government possesses only photocopied pages of a journal, not the physical object, and confirms the journal contains no entries about a trip the witness took to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00013673.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning confirms that Farmer, accompanied by her sister, visited Mr. Epstein's house where he advised her on college applications, suggesting UCLA and discussing how summer travel could help. The transcript also reveals that Epstein surprised Farmer with tickets to 'Phantom of the Opera' and that she ultimately attended an Ivy League school.
DOJ-OGR-00013644.jpg
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness identified as Farmer. She recounts being gifted expensive cowboy boots and subsequently going to the movies with Maxwell and Epstein. Farmer expresses initial hesitation about the movie outing due to a prior negative experience in a New York theater, but states she went because she believed it would be different with Maxwell present.
DOJ-OGR-00003082.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a memorandum of law, discussing the legal standards for perjury. The author argues against dismissing a perjury count before trial based on 'fundamental ambiguity,' citing numerous court cases to establish that such challenges are typically evaluated after a trial. The text distinguishes between answers that are literally true but misleading (which may not be perjury) and answers that are outright false, regardless of responsiveness (which can be perjury).
Bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell
Farmer addressed the court by telephone to urge the judge not to grant Maxwell bail.
Release date of the movie Primal Fear
The witness (Farmer) wrote back to an unnamed male, telling him that the movie Primal Fear was not released until April 3rd.
Bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell
Farmer addressed the court by telephone during the detention hearing, urging the judge not to grant Maxwell bail.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity