DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
470 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
470 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue captures a procedural discussion between the Judge, Defense Attorney Ms. Sternheim, and Prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the timing of the jury charge draft and estimates for closing arguments (summations). Ms. Sternheim makes a remark about the government getting 'two cracks' at closing arguments.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Discussing scheduling and closing arguments with the judge. Likely Bobbi Sternheim representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, discussing jury charges and scheduling.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Asking about the timing of the jury charge draft. Likely Maurene Comey.
|
| Hyppolite | Witness (implied) |
Name appears in the header 'Hyppolite - direct', suggesting a witness who testified prior to this procedural discussion.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, implied by 'DOJ-OGR' stamp.
|
|
| The Government |
Referred to by Ms. Sternheim regarding closing arguments structure.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied court location (SDNY) based on reporter's name.
|
Relationships (2)
Dialogue in transcript
Key Quotes (3)
"Is there any sense of when we might expect a draft of the jury charge?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #1
"That's tonight's project for the 9 a.m. conference."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #2
"I prefer actually getting two cracks at it, like the government, but we'll be sparse."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016726.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document