DOJ-OGR-00017006.jpg
587 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
587 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach regarding jury instructions concerning 'investigative techniques.' Everdell argues the charge should be removed as the defense did not elicit evidence on the topic, while Rohrbach argues it is a correct statement of law relevant to the case.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing to eliminate a specific jury charge regarding investigative techniques.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor |
Arguing in favor of including the jury instruction regarding investigative techniques.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the argument; likely Judge Alison J. Nathan based on case number AJN.
|
| Special Agent Young | Witness/Law Enforcement |
Mentioned by Everdell and the Court regarding questions asked the previous day.
|
| Sand | Legal Authority (Author) |
Referenced in the context of 'Sand charge' and 'Sand has filled three volumes,' referring to Judge Leonard Sand's Mod...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by the footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), specifically a discussion on jury instructions.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter name.
|
Relationships (2)
Everdell addressing 'The Court' or 'your Honor' making a legal request.
Arguing opposite sides of the jury instruction issue.
Key Quotes (3)
"The request is to eliminate the charge on this point because we couldn't -- we weren't supposed to, and nor did -- I think we tried to abide by the Court's ruling to not talk about particular investigative techniques"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017006.jpg
Quote #1
"Sand has filled three volumes of correct statements on law, your Honor. That doesn't mean that they get into a jury charge."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017006.jpg
Quote #2
"particular investigative techniques are not required."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017006.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document