Special Agent Young
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Law enforcement custody |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-21 | Witness testimony | Special Agent Young was on the stand testifying, during which Ms. Comey asked a question. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-04-19 | N/A | Epstein Estate attorneys reported potential CSAM discovery to the FBI. | New York | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Trial | A court trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where Ms. Comey is delivering a rebuttal argument. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038676.pdf
An FBI email dated August 21, 2024, from the National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) to Special Agent Young, detailing a call from a complainant alleging they were sex trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and an associate between 1989 and 1996 in Manhattan. The complainant claims to have been trafficked out of Sweden, alleges her father was blackmailed by Epstein's crew before his death in 2011, and describes a 1990 incident where another alleged victim visited her apartment with a stun gun.
DOJ-OGR-00008366.jpg
This legal document, dated December 13, 2021, chronicles the government's efforts throughout 2020 to contact and meet with an individual named Carolyn. The communications were primarily facilitated by an intermediary, Mr. Scarola, who was present at meetings on July 17 and August 11, 2020. The document details the timeline of contact attempts, the involvement of another associate named Mike Danchuck, and a specific statement Mr. Scarola made to the government during one of the meetings.
DOJ-OGR-00017198.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court rebuttal on August 10, 2022, where an attorney, Ms. Comey, argues against the defense's claim that the FBI manipulated witnesses. She asserts there is no evidence for this accusation, citing testimony from witnesses like Special Agent Young, Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie, who all stated they were only asked to tell the truth. Ms. Comey concludes that for the defense's argument to hold, the jury would have to believe that all these witnesses lied about the defendant's role in their abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017006.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Everdell and prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach regarding jury instructions concerning 'investigative techniques.' Everdell argues the charge should be removed as the defense did not elicit evidence on the topic, while Rohrbach argues it is a correct statement of law relevant to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016794.jpg
This court transcript page, dated August 10, 2022, details the direct examination of a witness named Young. Young explains the procedure for creating FBI Form 302s, stating that they and their partner, Detective Byrnes, take accurate notes during interviews and later compile them into a summary document. The witness confirms that a 302 is an accurate summary of an interview, not a verbatim transcript, and that both partners review the document before it is finalized.
DOJ-OGR-00014577.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Comey refutes the defense's suggestion (attributed to Ms. Menninger) that the FBI manipulated witnesses or asked leading questions, citing the ethical testimony of Special Agent Young. She argues that the victims (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) did not misremember the defendant's role in their abuse and that the defense's argument relies on the jury believing all witnesses are liars.
DOJ-OGR-00014560.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. In the transcript, a government attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues that opposing counsel's (Ms. Menninger's) comments about how witness interviews were conducted have an evidentiary basis from prior testimony. The judge overrules the government's request, stating that the basis for those comments was the cross-examination of the witnesses themselves, not the testimony Mr. Rohrbach cited.
[EXTERNAL EMAIL] - NTOC2024: Information Pertaining to Se...
Report detailing a call received from a victim alleging sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein between 1989-1996.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity