DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
615 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court document (legal order/opinion)
File Size:
615 KB
Summary
This document is page 24 of 33 from a court filing (Document 62) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 6, 2020. The text outlines the court's justification for a 'partial closure' of proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing legal precedent regarding public access to courts versus health safety concerns. It specifically references COVID-19 statistics in New Hampshire as of July 2, 2020, to support findings of necessity.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brennan, J. | Supreme Court Justice |
Cited in concurring opinion for Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Richmond Newspapers, Inc. |
Plaintiff in cited Supreme Court case
|
|
| N.H. Dep’t of Health and Human Servs. |
Source for COVID-19 statistics cited in footnote
|
|
| N.H. Pub. Radio |
Source for COVID-19 data cited in footnote
|
|
| US District Court |
The court issuing the order (implied by context of document)
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (indicated in footer)
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
State where COVID-19 statistics are being cited; location of proceedings
|
|
|
Referenced in case citation
|
Key Quotes (2)
"Under the extraordinary circumstances presented by the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, the court finds this partial closure is necessary."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
Quote #1
"First, the court finds that protecting the health and safety of the public and the parties to this proceeding from the spread of COVID-19 is a substantial interest that would be jeopardized and prejudiced if the court did not impose this partial closure."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document