District Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Assignment of civil case caption 9:08-CV-80736. | District Court | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued by US District Court, Southern District of Florida | Southern District of Florida | View |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 02 of 08.pdf
This document collection details the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution between late 2006 and early 2007. It includes internal FBI communications requesting travel to interview witnesses in New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the US Virgin Islands, as well as indications of coordination with the Palm Beach Police Department. The file also contains financial request forms for investigative expenses and notes the creation of link analysis charts (i2 Analyst Notebook) to track the case data.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
066-01.pdf
This is a Property Release Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States of America v. Tova Noel. The order, signed by Judge Analisa Torres, mandates the New York City Police Department to immediately return a firearm and other surrendered property to the defendant, Tova Noel, following an application by her attorney, Jason E. Foy.
019-04.pdf
A Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Court of Virginia for attorney John Marcus McNichols. The document certifies his admission to the bar on June 7, 2004, and his current good standing as of June 29, 2023. This document was filed as an exhibit in federal case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR (Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank) on June 30, 2023.
030.pdf
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
013.pdf
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
013-02.pdf
This document is a Clerk's Notice of Reassignment from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, dated April 10, 2009. It notifies parties in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case ID: 502008CA020614XXXXMB) that the case has been reassigned from Judge Diana Lewis to Judge Donald W. Hafele. The document lists attorneys Robert Critton Jr, Michael Pike, Isidro Garcia, and Jack Goldberger on the distribution list.
005-01.pdf
This document is a Civil Docket Report for a case filed on February 23, 2010, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case #: 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ). The case involves a 'Sealed Plaintiff' versus a 'Sealed Defandant' regarding personal injury. On March 9, 2010, Judge William J. Zloch signed an order granting the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously while unsealing the complaint and other documents.
044-03.pdf
A legal declaration by Jane Doe No. 6 filed on July 29, 2009 (signed July 22, 2009). The plaintiff states that on July 9, 2009, an investigator sent by Jeffrey Epstein visited her former employer at A Affordable Auto Insurance in Lake Worth, Florida, asking personal questions. She expresses fear that Epstein will continue to send investigators to her acquaintances, potentially revealing her identity as a plaintiff in a sexual abuse lawsuit.
045.pdf
A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on July 11, 2020. The parties request that the current lawsuit remain stayed pending the resolution of the compensation claim.
EFTA00039019.pdf
An April 2023 email chain between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent regarding the discovery of potential Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). During a legal review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender that potentially depicted minors. The Estate halted the review and reported the finding to the FBI for guidance.
EFTA00039011.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 19, 2023, between Daniel Ruzumna (attorney for the Epstein Estate) and an FBI Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking division. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography (CSAM) depicting topless women, which had been shared with Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The emails coordinate a phone call between the attorneys and the FBI to discuss the discovery and next steps.
EFTA00039004.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April 2023 between lawyers representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Patterson Belknap and Hughes Hubbard) and the FBI Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report finding a video potentially containing Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) among 1,100 videos extracted from Epstein's files during a document review. They arrange a meeting at the Hughes Hubbard offices in New York to discuss the finding and hand over information to the FBI.
EFTA00038997.pdf
This document is a chain of emails from April and May 2023 between legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed and Patterson Belknap) and the FBI's Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit. The lawyers report that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, they discovered material potentially constituting Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). They halted their review, contacted the FBI to hand over the materials, and arranged meetings to facilitate this process.
EFTA00038686.pdf
An electronic calendar entry titled 'Maxwell Juror Questionnaire Administration' scheduled for November 4-6, 2021, at '40 Foley Courthouse'. The document, created in August 2021, relates to the jury selection process for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The identities of the organizer and attendees are completely redacted.
EFTA00038683.pdf
This document is an email header dated August 27, 2021, related to the administration of juror questionnaires for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender and recipients are redacted, though the context and partial visibility suggest involvement of the US Department of Justice.
EFTA00038597.pdf
This document is an email read receipt dated May 3, 2021, regarding the legal case 'US v. Maxwell'. The subject line refers to a conferral regarding 'photo and other discovery deficiencies', indicating ongoing legal disputes over evidence handling in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
EFTA00037099.pdf
This document is page 21 of 23 from a legal filing (Document 256) in Case 1:22-cv-10019-JSR (Doe v. Deutsche Bank), filed on November 2, 2023. It argues that an objector, Ms. [REDACTED], failed to credibly allege conflicts of interest regarding the Claims Administrator and notes she did not opt out of the settlement despite receiving notice. The image appears to be a screenshot of the PDF being viewed within a ProtonMail browser interface.
EFTA00030148.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorney Andrew Patel and likely the US Attorney's Office regarding the Epstein case. The discussion centers on the Government's obligation to produce notes from a meeting with Patel's client (whose name is redacted) to the defense counsel. Patel argues that his client is not a witness, the information is not Brady material (exculpatory evidence), and that revealing his client's identity or the fact that he met with the Government could compromise his safety. Patel notes that an 'error' made by his client is contradicted by surveillance video evidence.
EFTA00029515.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns the drafting and editing of a 'Status Hearing Notification' to be sent to victims in the case of US v. Epstein via the Victim Notification System (VNS). Staff members discuss technical limitations of the VNS templates and specific language changes regarding contact information for victims attending the hearing.
EFTA00028471.pdf
An email thread from November 6, 2019, involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP regarding the case Doe v. Indyke, et al. (1:19-cv-08673-KPF). Associate Kyla Magun writes to Judge Failla to submit a courtesy copy of a response letter filed by Roberta Kaplan on behalf of Plaintiff Jane Doe, countering letters filed by the defendants the previous night.
EFTA00028375.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses regarding an 'Additional warrant app.' Judge Moses sets a deadline of 11:00 PM for review that night, suggesting Judge Pitman as an alternative for the next day. The AUSA responds shortly after (approx 9:28 PM EST based on the UTC timestamp) attaching a search warrant application titled '2019.07.07_Media_SW.pdf' and noting that the affiant (a Special Agent) is available.
EFTA00027653.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00024912.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (led by Bobbi Sternheim) and the US Government prosecutors regarding the scheduling of the trial start date in Case 20 Cr. 330. The defense argues strongly for a November 8, 2021 start date, citing Maxwell's health in detention and holiday conflicts, while the government proposes November 29, 2021, citing witness availability. The defense also leverages the scheduling dispute to suggest that granting Maxwell bail would resolve the flexibility issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity