DOJ-OGR-00004886.jpg

769 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court opinion exhibit
File Size: 769 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text is an excerpt from a judicial opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling overturning Bill Cosby's conviction), which is being cited as a precedent. It discusses the principles of 'fundamental fairness' and 'detrimental reliance' regarding non-prosecution agreements/decisions by District Attorneys, arguing that the Montgomery County DA must abide by the former DA's promise not to prosecute Cosby. This was likely submitted by Maxwell's defense to argue that the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement should similarly protect her.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Cosby Defendant (in cited case)
Subject of a legal argument regarding non-prosecution agreements and detrimental reliance.
D.A. Castor District Attorney (former)
Made a charging decision intended to induce waiver of Cosby's rights.
Constand Victim/Civil Plaintiff
Involved in the incident regarding Cosby; her civil attorneys received inculpatory statements.
McSorley Defendant (cited case case)
Cited in Commonwealth v. McSorley regarding plea offer enforcement.
Stipetich Defendant (cited case)
Subject of a case regarding a defective non-prosecution agreement involving drug sources.
Kratsas Legal Precedent
Cited case regarding fundamental fairness.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office
The office being compelled to stand by the decision of its former elected head.
Commonwealth
Refers to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (implied by case citations).

Timeline (2 events)

Decade-old decision (contextual)
D.A. Castor made a public decision not to prosecute Cosby to induce a waiver of rights.
Montgomery County
July 2, 2021
Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Court Filing

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the District Attorney's Office mentioned.

Relationships (2)

D.A. Castor Prosecutor/Defendant Cosby
Castor made a charging decision regarding Cosby.
Cosby Legal Adversaries Constand
Cosby provided Constand’s civil attorneys with inculpatory statements.

Key Quotes (3)

"specific performance of D.A. Castor’s decision... is the only remedy that comports with society’s reasonable expectations"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004886.jpg
Quote #1
"Cosby reasonably relied to his detriment upon that decade-old decision when he declined to attempt to avail himself of his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004886.jpg
Quote #2
"compelling the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office to stand by the decision of its former elected head"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00004886.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document