DOJ-OGR-00010371.jpg
711 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal opinion
File Size:
711 KB
Summary
This document is page 5 of a court filing from April 29, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text outlines applicable law regarding the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, specifically discussing 'multiplicity' in indictments and how to determine if conspiracy charges involve the same agreement. It cites various legal precedents including Brown v. Ohio, United States v. Jones, and a previous ruling in the Maxwell case itself.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant (Implied by Case Number and Citation) |
Cited in text as 'Maxwell, 534 F. Supp. 3d at 322'; Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE is United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Implied by case number format and citation S.D.N.Y.
|
|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit |
Cited frequently as '2d Cir.'
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Footer indicates 'DOJ-OGR' (Office of Government Relations)
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in citations (S.D.N.Y.)
|
Key Quotes (3)
"The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall 'be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010371.jpg
Quote #1
"An indictment is multiplicitous, and therefore implicates double jeopardy, 'when it charges a single offense as an offense multiple times, in separate counts, when, in law and fact, only one crime has been committed.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010371.jpg
Quote #2
"If the two offenses at issue are both conspiracies charged under the same statute, then the multiplicity inquiry turns on whether the two conspiracies are the same 'in fact,' meaning they involve the same agreement."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010371.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document