HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017657.jpg
1.79 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / law review article excerpt
File Size:
1.79 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 22 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing legal procedure rules (Rule 12.1 and 12.3) concerning the disclosure of witness information in criminal trials. It specifically focuses on the balance between a defendant's right to information and the protection of victims' addresses and telephone numbers. The document was produced by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney / Document Custodian |
Name appears centered at the bottom of the document, suggesting this was part of his file or submission.
|
| Cassell | Author / Legal Scholar |
Cited in footnotes 178 and 179 regarding 'Proposed Amendments'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Utah Law Review |
Source of the text (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
|
|
| Advisory Committee |
Mentioned as proposing limited protections for victims' addresses.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Relationships (1)
Document bears David Schoen's name and a House Oversight Bates stamp.
Key Quotes (2)
"If the government intends to rely on a victim's testimony to establish the defendant's presence at the scene of the alleged offense and the defendant establishes a need for the victim's address and telephone number, the court may... fashion a reasonable procedure that allows the preparation of the defense and also protects the victim's interests."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017657.jpg
Quote #1
"The Advisory Committee proposed more limited protection for victims' addresses and telephone numbers"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017657.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document